Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Opinion: Senior Scientists Should Be Writing

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatFormidling

  1. Opinion: Stop gaming peer review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatFormidling

  1. Vagal afferent cholecystokinin receptor activation is required for glucagon-like peptide-1-induced satiation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Coagulation parameters in the newborn and infant - the Copenhagen Baby Heart and COMPARE studies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Entero-pancreatic hormone secretion, gastric emptying, and glucose absorption after frequently sampled meal tests

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Copeptin and renal function decline, cardiovascular events and mortality in type 1 diabetes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Combinatorial, additive and dose-dependent drug–microbiome associations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Success in science is largely defined by publishing scientific results in relevant journals. However, writing science is about much more than simply describing methods, reporting results, calculating statistics, and quantifying one’s career achievements. It’s a critical skill that can improve one’s research.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScientist
ISSN0890-3670
StatusUdgivet - 7 apr. 2015

ID: 45860926