TY - JOUR
T1 - Once-weekly insulin icodec compared with daily basal insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes
T2 - Participant-level meta-analysis of the ONWARDS 1-5 trials
AU - Bajaj, Harpreet S
AU - Ásbjörnsdóttir, Björg
AU - Bari, Tanvir J
AU - Begtrup, Kamilla
AU - Vilsbøll, Tina
AU - Rosenstock, Julio
N1 - © 2024 Novo Nordisk A/S and The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - AIM: To perform a participant-level post hoc meta-analysis of Phase 3a trials in type 2 diabetes (T2D) to characterize the hypoglycaemia safety and glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec).MATERIALS AND METHODS: All ONWARDS 1-5 randomized participants were pooled as overall T2D, insulin-naive, an insulin-experienced subgroups, and by once-daily trial comparator (degludec or glargine U100). The main outcomes included incidence and rates of clinically significant and severe hypoglycaemia. Additional endpoints included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline and HbA1c target achievement without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia.RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 3765 participants (1882 icodec vs. 1883 comparators). In the overall T2D pool, clinically significant hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in the icodec group versus the comparator group (17.9% vs. 16.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94, 1.38); however, rates were low but significantly higher in the icodec group (1.15 vs. 1.00 episodes/participant-year of exposure, estimated rate ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.24, 1.85]). Fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with icodec than with comparators (8 vs. 18). A greater reduction in HbA1c occurred with icodec versus comparators, irrespective of subgroup (estimated treatment difference range [-0.10 to -0.29%]; all p < 0.05). Across subgroups, except for the insulin-experienced subgroup, the odds of achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia were greater with icodec than with comparators (OR range 1.30-1.55; all p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Icodec was associated with a similar incidence but higher rates of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (equating to one additional hypoglycaemic episode every 6 years) and fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes versus comparators. Our findings also confirmed the greater efficacy of icodec that was demonstrated in the ONWARDS trial programme.
AB - AIM: To perform a participant-level post hoc meta-analysis of Phase 3a trials in type 2 diabetes (T2D) to characterize the hypoglycaemia safety and glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec).MATERIALS AND METHODS: All ONWARDS 1-5 randomized participants were pooled as overall T2D, insulin-naive, an insulin-experienced subgroups, and by once-daily trial comparator (degludec or glargine U100). The main outcomes included incidence and rates of clinically significant and severe hypoglycaemia. Additional endpoints included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline and HbA1c target achievement without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia.RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 3765 participants (1882 icodec vs. 1883 comparators). In the overall T2D pool, clinically significant hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in the icodec group versus the comparator group (17.9% vs. 16.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94, 1.38); however, rates were low but significantly higher in the icodec group (1.15 vs. 1.00 episodes/participant-year of exposure, estimated rate ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.24, 1.85]). Fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with icodec than with comparators (8 vs. 18). A greater reduction in HbA1c occurred with icodec versus comparators, irrespective of subgroup (estimated treatment difference range [-0.10 to -0.29%]; all p < 0.05). Across subgroups, except for the insulin-experienced subgroup, the odds of achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia were greater with icodec than with comparators (OR range 1.30-1.55; all p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Icodec was associated with a similar incidence but higher rates of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (equating to one additional hypoglycaemic episode every 6 years) and fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes versus comparators. Our findings also confirmed the greater efficacy of icodec that was demonstrated in the ONWARDS trial programme.
KW - Blood Glucose/drug effects
KW - Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy
KW - Drug Administration Schedule
KW - Female
KW - Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis
KW - Humans
KW - Hypoglycemia/chemically induced
KW - Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Incidence
KW - Insulin Glargine/administration & dosage
KW - Insulin, Long-Acting/administration & dosage
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - hypoglycaemia
KW - meta-analysis
KW - basal insulin
KW - type 2 diabetes
KW - continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
KW - glycaemic control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197252040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/dom.15726
DO - 10.1111/dom.15726
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38951942
SN - 1462-8902
VL - 26
SP - 3810
EP - 3820
JO - Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
JF - Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
IS - 9
ER -