Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

    24 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the preferred treatment in patients with complex coronary artery disease. However, whether the procedure should be performed with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, referred to as off-pump and on-pump CABG, is still up for debate. Intuitively, avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass seems beneficial as the systemic inflammatory response from extracorporeal circulation is omitted, but no single randomized trial has been able to prove off-pump CABG superior to on-pump CABG as regards the hard outcomes death, stroke or myocardial infarction. In contrast, off-pump CABG is technically more challenging and may be associated with increased risk of incomplete revascularization. The purpose of the review is to summarize the current literature comparing outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftCurrent Cardiology Reports (Print)
    Vol/bind16
    Udgave nummer3
    Sider (fra-til)455
    ISSN1534-3170
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - mar. 2014

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater