Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Dokumenter

Links

  1. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Re: Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  3. "Adaptive pathways" to drug authorisation: adapting to industry?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Antidepressants are addictive and increase the risk of relapse

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  5. Author's reply to Dubicka and colleagues and Stone

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  1. Simulation of advanced cataract surgery - validation of a newly developed test

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Impact of Glucose Level on Micro- and Macrovascular Disease in the General Population: A Mendelian Randomization Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
To evaluate the impact of non-blinded outcome assessment on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftB M J
Vol/bind344
Sider (fra-til)e1119
ISSN0959-8146
StatusUdgivet - 2012

Mest downloadede publikationer

Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 34616602