Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Observational study of a new modular femoral revision system

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Does ethnicity and education influence preoperative disability and expectations in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Possibilities for arthroscopic treatment of the ageing sternoclavicular joint

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Tourniquets do not increase the total blood loss or re-amputation risk in transtibial amputations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Surgical apgar score predicts early complication in transfemoral amputees: Retrospective study of 170 major amputations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Preoperative BMD does not influence femoral stem subsidence of uncemented THA when the femoral T-score is > -2.5

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Influence of day of surgery and prediction of LOS > 2 days after fast-track hip and knee replacement

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. No difference for changes in BMD between two different cementless hip stem designs 2 years after THA

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The uncemented ArcosTM Modular Femoral Revision System (ARCOS) is a new comprehensive, press-fit revision design. The modular design offers a wide range of possible combinations to accommodate different variations of anatomy and bone stock. The ARCOS is made by a proximal body and a distal stem. As probably the only ones worldwide we predominantly use a combination of body and stem which supports proximal fixation and load, since this mimics the concept of the primary total hip arthroplasty with proximal weight-bearing, leading to bone stock preservation and no stress shielding or thigh pain.

AIM: To evaluate the early results after femoral revision in a consecutive series of patients undergoing surgery over 3 years.

METHODS: We included 116 patients in the study. They were operated in the period August 2011 to December 2014 and we got a clinical mean observation time of 4 (0.5-6) years. Clinical and radiographical follow-up included present function of the hip assessed by Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, and EQ5D (measure of health outcome). Of the 116 patients, 17 died in the interim and were consequently included only in the implant survivorship analysis; 46 patients attended the follow-up control.

RESULTS: In total 6 (5%) hips were re-revised due to infection (n = 3), fracture (n = 2) or subsidence (n = 1). No patient was re-revised due to aseptic loosening. The 1-, 2- and 5-year probability of implant survival (95%CI) were 97% (93%-100%), 97% (93%-100%) and 96% (92%-99%), respectively. In this cohort 95 patients received a combination of a proximal broach and a distal curved and slotted stem (BS), aiming for proximal fixation and load bearing; 21 patients received a different combination. When comparing these two groups the BS-group had a 5-year implant survival probability (95%CI) of 97% (93%-100%) compared with the group of other combinations with a 5-year implant survival probability (95%CI) of 90% (78%-100%) (P = 0.3). Our regression analysis showed that periprosthetic fracture as an indication for the ARCOS operation was the only significant negative outcome predictor. The mean Harris Hip Score result (100 points being best) was 83 (range 5-98). The mean Oxford Hip Score result (48 points being best) was 40 (range 19-48).

CONCLUSION: The early results of the ARCOS are promising compared with similar studies. We encourage the use of the BS combination whenever the bone stock proximally is adequate.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftWorld Journal of Orthopaedics
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)167-176
Antal sider10
ISSN2218-5836
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 18 mar. 2020

Bibliografisk note

©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 62388011