Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Novel methods to study aphasia recovery after stroke

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. What's in a Name? Neurological Eponyms of the Nazi Era

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. A brain-computer interface to support functional recovery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Diagnostic approach to functional recovery: functional magnetic resonance imaging after stroke

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Diagnostic approach to functional recovery: diffusion-weighted imaging and tractography

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Guidelines for TMS/tES Clinical Services and Research through the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Probing Context-Dependent Modulations of Ipsilateral Premotor-Motor Connectivity in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Probing EEG activity in the targeted cortex after focal transcranial electrical stimulation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
The neural mechanisms that support aphasia recovery are not yet fully understood. It has been argued that the functional reorganization of language networks after left-hemisphere stroke may engage perilesional left brain areas as well as homologous right-hemisphere regions. In this chapter, we summarize how noninvasive brain stimulation can be used to elucidate mechanisms of plasticity in language networks and enhance language recovery after stroke. We first outline some basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We then present evidence from studies in healthy volunteers for a causal role of the right hemisphere in different language functions. Finally, we review recent studies that used TMS or tDCS to promote language recovery after stroke. Most of these studies applied noninvasive brain stimulation over contralateral right-hemisphere areas to suppress maladaptive plasticity. However, some studies also suggest that right-hemisphere regions may beneficially contribute to recovery in some patients. More recently, some investigators have targeted perilesional brain regions to promote neurorehabilitation. In sum, these studies indicate that language recovery after stroke may integrate left- as well as right-hemisphere brain regions to a different degree over the time course of recovery. Although the results of these preliminary studies provide some evidence that noninvasive brain stimulation may promote aphasia recovery, the reported effect sizes are not striking. Future studies on larger patient collectives are needed to explore whether noninvasive brain stimulation can enhance language functions at a level that is clinically relevant.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
BogserieFrontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience
Vol/bind32
Sider (fra-til)101-111
Antal sider11
ISSN1660-4431
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

ID: 42442484