Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. A phenome-wide association and Mendelian Randomisation study of polygenic risk for depression in UK Biobank

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Sex differences in trauma exposure and symptomatology in trauma-affected refugees

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The Agents Intervening against Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit-Trial (AID-ICU trial):- a detailed statistical analysis plan

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in the ultra-high risk state for psychosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  5. The Duffy-null genotype and risk of infection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) present with subtle
alterations in cerebral white matter (WM), which appear to be associated with clinical and functional outcome. The effect of cognitive remediation on WM organization in UHR individuals has not been investigated previously.

Methods: In a randomized, clinical trial, UHR individuals aged 18 to 40 years were assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus cognitive remediation for 20 weeks. Cognitive remediation comprised 20 x 2-h sessions of neurocognitive and social-cognitive training. Primary outcome was whole brain fractional anisotropy derived from diffusion weighted imaging, statistically tested as an interaction between timepoint and treatment group. Secondary outcomes were restricted to five predefined region of interest (ROI) analyses on fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity and mean diffusivity. For significant timepoint and treatment group interactions within these five ROIs, we explored associations between longitudinal changes in WM and cognitive functions/clinical symptoms. Finally, we explored dose-response effects of cognitive remediation on WM.

Results: A total of 111 UHR individuals were included. Attrition-rate was 26%. The cognitive remediation group completed on average 12 h of neurocognitive training, which was considerably lower than per protocol. We found no effect of cognitive remediation on whole-brain FA when compared to treatment as usual. Secondary ROI analyses revealed a nominal significant interaction between timepoint*treatment of AD in left mediallemniscus (P=0.016) which did not survive control for multiple comparisons. The exploratory test showed that this change in AD correlated to improvements of mental flexibility in the cognitive remediation group (p=0.001). We found no dose-response effect of neurocognitive training on WM.

Conclusions: Cognitive remediation comprising 12 h of neurocognitive training on average did not improve global or regional WM organization in UHR individuals. Further investigations of duration and intensity of cognitive training as necessary prerequisites of neuroplasticity-based changes are warranted.
TidsskriftFrontiers in Psychiatry
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 28 aug. 2020

ID: 60813180