Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

New Validated Method for Measuring Fat Graft Retention in the Breast with MRI

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Lymphatic Function in the Arms of Breast Cancer Patients-A Prospective Cohort Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. High-end versus Low-end Thermal Imaging for Detection of Arterial Perforators

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Lipovol: A Free and Validated Software for Measuring Fat Graft Volume Retention in the Breast With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt i tidsskriftForskning

  4. A Novel Porcine Model for Future Studies of Cell-enriched Fat Grafting

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Impact of human papillomavirus in sinonasal cancer-a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Systemic Immune Profile in Patients With CRSwNP

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Methods for collecting upper respiratory tract specimens for COVID-19 diagnostics

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

In this study, we present a new method for measuring fat graft volume retention in the breast based on magnetic resonance imaging scans and a validation study to assess its accuracy and precision. The method was validated by 4 observers using the magnetic resonance imaging scans of 14 patients undergoing breast augmentation with fat grafting. The method was translated into software and was used to measure the change in breast volume from a preoperative scan to a postoperative scan recorded within 3 hours after the surgery, which was compared with the injected fat graft volume. The new method measured the injected fat graft volumes with an average systematic overestimation of 6.3% (SD, 10.5). The median interobserver variation was <7%. We propose that this new method can be a good alternative to previous techniques for clinical research purposes. The software can be made available upon request free of charge for use on the MeVisLab platform.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere3052
TidsskriftPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
Vol/bind8
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)e3052
ISSN2169-7574
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

ID: 61833865