TY - JOUR
T1 - New clinical and biological insights from the international TARGIT-A randomised trial of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy for breast cancer
AU - Vaidya, Jayant S.
AU - Bulsara, Max
AU - Baum, Michael
AU - Wenz, Frederik
AU - Massarut, Samuele
AU - Pigorsch, Steffi
AU - Alvarado, Michael
AU - Douek, Michael
AU - Saunders, Christobel
AU - Flyger, Henrik
AU - Eiermann, Wolfgang
AU - Brew-Graves, Chris
AU - Williams, Norman R.
AU - Potyka, Ingrid
AU - Roberts, Nicholas
AU - Bernstein, Marcelle
AU - Brown, Douglas
AU - Sperk, Elena
AU - Laws, Siobhan
AU - Sütterlin, Marc
AU - Corica, Tammy
AU - Lundgren, Steinar
AU - Holmes, Dennis
AU - Vinante, Lorenzo
AU - Bozza, Fernando
AU - Pazos, Montserrat
AU - Blanc-Onfroy, Magali Le
AU - Gruber, Günther
AU - Polkowski, Wojciech
AU - Dedes, Konstantin J.
AU - Niewald, Marcus
AU - Blohmer, Jens
AU - McReady, David
AU - Hoefer, Richard
AU - Kelemen, Pond
AU - Petralia, Gloria
AU - Falzon, Mary
AU - Joseph, David
AU - Tobias, Jeffrey S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Competing interests J.S.V. has received a research grant from Photoelectron Corp (1996–99) and from Carl Zeiss for supporting data management at the University of Dundee (Dundee, UK, 2004-2008) and has received honoraria. J.S.V., J.S.T., N.W., I.P., C. B.-G. and N.R. receive funding from HTA, NIHR, Department of Health for some activities related to the TARGIT trials. M.Ba. was briefly on the scientific advisory board of Carl Zeiss and was paid consultancy fees before 2010. F.W. has received a research grant from Carl Zeiss for supporting radiobiological research. Carl Zeiss sponsors some of the travel and accommodation for meetings of the international steering committee and data monitoring committee and when necessary for conferences where a presentation about targeted intraoperative radiotherapy is being made for all authors apart from WE who declares that he has no conflicts of interest. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
Funding information The study was sponsored by University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre. Funding was provided by UCLH Charities, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme, Ninewells Cancer Campaign, National Health and Medical Research Council, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) FKZ 01ZP0508. The infrastructure of the trial operations office in London, UK, was supported by core funding from Cancer Research Campaign (now Cancer Research UK) when the trial was initiated. The funding organisations had no role in the concept, design, analysis or writing of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/3
Y1 - 2021/8/3
N2 - Background: The TARGIT-A trial reported risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) during lumpectomy for breast cancer to be as effective as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Here, we present further detailed analyses. Methods: In total, 2298 women (≥45 years, invasive ductal carcinoma ≤3.5 cm, cN0–N1) were randomised. We investigated the impact of tumour size, grade, ER, PgR, HER2 and lymph node status on local recurrence-free survival, and of local recurrence on distant relapse and mortality. We analysed the predictive factors for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT as part of the risk-adapted approach, using regression modelling. Non-breast cancer mortality was compared between TARGIT-IORT plus EBRT vs. EBRT. Results: Local recurrence-free survival was no different between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT, in every tumour subgroup. Unlike in the EBRT arm, local recurrence in the TARGIT-IORT arm was not a predictor of a higher risk of distant relapse or death. Our new predictive tool for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT is at https://targit.org.uk/addrt. Non-breast cancer mortality was significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm, even when patients received supplemental EBRT, HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.88) P = 0.0091. Conclusion: TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups. Local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT, unlike after EBRT, has a good prognosis. TARGIT-IORT might have a beneficial abscopal effect. Trial registration: ISRCTN34086741 (21/7/2004), NCT00983684 (24/9/2009).
AB - Background: The TARGIT-A trial reported risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) during lumpectomy for breast cancer to be as effective as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Here, we present further detailed analyses. Methods: In total, 2298 women (≥45 years, invasive ductal carcinoma ≤3.5 cm, cN0–N1) were randomised. We investigated the impact of tumour size, grade, ER, PgR, HER2 and lymph node status on local recurrence-free survival, and of local recurrence on distant relapse and mortality. We analysed the predictive factors for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT as part of the risk-adapted approach, using regression modelling. Non-breast cancer mortality was compared between TARGIT-IORT plus EBRT vs. EBRT. Results: Local recurrence-free survival was no different between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT, in every tumour subgroup. Unlike in the EBRT arm, local recurrence in the TARGIT-IORT arm was not a predictor of a higher risk of distant relapse or death. Our new predictive tool for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT is at https://targit.org.uk/addrt. Non-breast cancer mortality was significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm, even when patients received supplemental EBRT, HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.88) P = 0.0091. Conclusion: TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups. Local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT, unlike after EBRT, has a good prognosis. TARGIT-IORT might have a beneficial abscopal effect. Trial registration: ISRCTN34086741 (21/7/2004), NCT00983684 (24/9/2009).
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Breast Neoplasms/pathology
KW - Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
KW - Combined Modality Therapy
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Intraoperative Care
KW - Mastectomy, Segmental/methods
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Prognosis
KW - Survival Analysis
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Tumor Burden
KW - Whole-Body Irradiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106457037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-021-01440-8
DO - 10.1038/s41416-021-01440-8
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34035435
AN - SCOPUS:85106457037
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 125
SP - 380
EP - 389
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 3
ER -