Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Neurostereologic Lesion Volumes and Spreading Depolarizations in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Pilot Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Autonomic Dysfunction in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Puts Patients at Risk

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  2. What Should a Clinician Do When Spreading Depolarizations are Observed in a Patient?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Which Spreading Depolarizations Are Deleterious To Brain Tissue?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Continuous EEG Monitoring in a Consecutive Patient Cohort with Sepsis and Delirium

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Spreading depolarizations (SDs) occur in 50-60% of patients after surgical treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are independently associated with unfavorable outcomes. Here we performed a pilot study to examine the relationship between SDs and various types of intracranial lesions, progression of parenchymal damage, and outcomes.

METHODS: In a multicenter study, fifty patients (76% male; median age 40) were monitored for SD by continuous electrocorticography (ECoG; median duration 79 h) following surgical treatment of severe TBI. Volumes of hemorrhage and parenchymal damage were estimated using unbiased stereologic assessment of preoperative, postoperative, and post-ECoG serial computed tomography (CT) studies. Neurologic outcomes were assessed at 6 months by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.

RESULTS: Preoperative volumes of subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but not parenchymal damage, were significantly associated with the occurrence of SDs (P's < 0.05). Parenchymal damage increased significantly (median 34 ml [Interquartile range (IQR) - 2, 74]) over 7 (5, 8) days from preoperative to post-ECoG CT studies. Patients with and without SDs did not differ in extent of parenchymal damage increase [47 ml (3, 101) vs. 30 ml (- 2, 50), P = 0.27], but those exhibiting the isoelectric subtype of SDs had greater initial parenchymal damage and greater increases than other patients (P's < 0.05). Patients with temporal clusters of SDs (≥ 3 in 2 h; n = 10 patients), which included those with isoelectric SDs, had worse outcomes than those without clusters (P = 0.03), and parenchymal damage expansion also correlated with worse outcomes (P = 0.01). In multivariate regression with imputation, both clusters and lesion expansion were significant outcome predictors.

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that subarachnoid and subdural blood are important primary injury factors in provoking SDs and that clustered SDs and parenchymal lesion expansion contribute independently to worse patient outcomes. These results warrant future prospective studies using detailed quantification of TBI lesion types to better understand the relationship between anatomic and physiologic measures of secondary injury.

TidsskriftNeurocritical Care
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)557-568
Antal sider12
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2019

ID: 59151721