Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Myocardial perfusion during atrial fibrillation in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure: a cross-sectional study using Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer and the risk of coronary artery disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Duration of Heart Failure and Effect of Defibrillator Implantation in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Clinical implications of electrocardiographic bundle branch block in primary care

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Association of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome With Amyloidosis, Heart Failure, and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Aims: Patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure often have reduced myocardial blood flow without significant coronary atherosclerosis. Likewise, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have reduced myocardial perfusion during AF compared with sinus rhythm. The aim of this study was to explore whether there is an additive negative effect of AF during scan on the myocardial perfusion in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure.

Methods and results: We included 27 young healthy controls and 114 patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure to a Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography perfusion scan (23 with AF during scan). To obtain the myocardial flow reserve (MFR = stress flow/rest flow), patients were scanned at rest and during adenosine-induced stress. Among patients, those with AF were older [years: 73; interquartile range (IQR) 65-78 vs. 67; IQR 60-74; P = 0.03] and more were men (87% vs. 62%; P = 0.02). Distribution of sex in controls did not differ from either patient group. Patients with AF had significantly lower MFR than patients without [MFR: 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58-2.22 vs. 2.50; 95% CI 2.06-2.86; percent difference: -21.5%; P = 0.01]. MFR remained significantly lower in the group with AF (estimate -24.2%; 95% CI -39.6% to -4.8%; P = 0.02) in an adjusted multivariable regression analysis. Further, patients had lower MFR compared with controls: 3.46; 95% CI 3.03-3.94; P < 0.0001. Additionally, coronary vascular resistance was highest in patients with AF and lowest in controls.

Conclusion: Patients with systolic heart failure had lower flow reserve than healthy controls and even lower MFR if they had AF during scan.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean heart journal cardiovascular Imaging
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)233-240
ISSN1525-2167
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

ID: 55062561