TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular-clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in 163 metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas with a comparison to colorectal adenocarcinomas
AU - Morken, Siren
AU - Langer, Seppo W
AU - Hjortland, Geir Olav
AU - Sundlöv, Anna
AU - Hofsli, Eva
AU - Ladekarl, Morten
AU - Tabaksblat, Elizaveta
AU - Vestermark, Lene Weber
AU - Svensson, Johanna
AU - Knigge, Ulrich
AU - Nunes, Luís
AU - Glimelius, Bengt
AU - Pfeiffer, Per
AU - Aasebø, Kristine
AU - Assmus, Jörg
AU - Vassella, Erik
AU - Lothe, Inger Marie Bowitz
AU - Couvelard, Anne
AU - Perren, Aurel
AU - Knappskog, Stian
AU - Sorbye, Halfdan
N1 - © 2026 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.
PY - 2026/2/5
Y1 - 2026/2/5
N2 - There is limited data regarding the rare and aggressive colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (CR-NEC). In this large prospective study, molecular-clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes following palliative chemotherapy are reported for 163 metastatic CR-NEC patients, with a comparison to a population-based prospective cohort of 263 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CR-AC) patients. Eighty-three percent of CR-NEC received first-line platinum-etoposide, while 98% of CR-AC patients received first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Disease control rate across all first-line regimens in CR-NEC and CR-AC was 43% vs. 74%, immediate progressive disease 46% vs. 15%, progression-free survival 2.4 months (m) (95% CI 2.1-3.3) vs. 7.7 m (95% CI 6.9-8.5), and overall survival 6.7 m (95% CI 5.6-8.8) vs. 16.8 m (95% CI 13.7-20.3), all, p < .001. CR-NEC more often had synchronous metastases, worse performance status, and symptom burden at treatment initiation than CR-AC (all, p < .001). Two-year survival was 9% vs. 37% in CR-NEC and CR-AC (p < .001). BRAF mutations were frequent in CR-NEC and CR-AC (26% vs. 20%, p = .153) and associated with shorter OS in CR-NEC and CR-AC (p = .025 and p = .003). KRAS mutations were less frequent in CR-NEC than CR-AC (34% vs. 45%, p = .041), but only associated with shorter OS in rectal NEC (p = .04). The frequencies of APC and TP53 mutations were similar between the cohorts and did not impact survival. Metastatic CR-NEC and CR-AC are clinically distinct, with NEC demonstrating more aggressive features, limited treatment effect, and worse prognosis. Although they share important driver mutations, the underlying reason for their marked clinical differences remains unclear.
AB - There is limited data regarding the rare and aggressive colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (CR-NEC). In this large prospective study, molecular-clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes following palliative chemotherapy are reported for 163 metastatic CR-NEC patients, with a comparison to a population-based prospective cohort of 263 metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (CR-AC) patients. Eighty-three percent of CR-NEC received first-line platinum-etoposide, while 98% of CR-AC patients received first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Disease control rate across all first-line regimens in CR-NEC and CR-AC was 43% vs. 74%, immediate progressive disease 46% vs. 15%, progression-free survival 2.4 months (m) (95% CI 2.1-3.3) vs. 7.7 m (95% CI 6.9-8.5), and overall survival 6.7 m (95% CI 5.6-8.8) vs. 16.8 m (95% CI 13.7-20.3), all, p < .001. CR-NEC more often had synchronous metastases, worse performance status, and symptom burden at treatment initiation than CR-AC (all, p < .001). Two-year survival was 9% vs. 37% in CR-NEC and CR-AC (p < .001). BRAF mutations were frequent in CR-NEC and CR-AC (26% vs. 20%, p = .153) and associated with shorter OS in CR-NEC and CR-AC (p = .025 and p = .003). KRAS mutations were less frequent in CR-NEC than CR-AC (34% vs. 45%, p = .041), but only associated with shorter OS in rectal NEC (p = .04). The frequencies of APC and TP53 mutations were similar between the cohorts and did not impact survival. Metastatic CR-NEC and CR-AC are clinically distinct, with NEC demonstrating more aggressive features, limited treatment effect, and worse prognosis. Although they share important driver mutations, the underlying reason for their marked clinical differences remains unclear.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029469225
U2 - 10.1002/ijc.70367
DO - 10.1002/ijc.70367
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41642024
SN - 0020-7136
JO - International Journal of Cancer
JF - International Journal of Cancer
ER -