TY - JOUR
T1 - Mode of delivery and mortality and morbidity for very preterm singleton infants in a breech position
T2 - A European cohort study
AU - Schmidt, Stephan
AU - Norman, Mikael
AU - Misselwitz, Bjorn
AU - Piedvache, Aurélie
AU - Huusom, Lene D
AU - Varendi, Heili
AU - Barros, Henrique
AU - Cammu, Hendrik
AU - Blondel, Béatrice
AU - Dudenhausen, Joachim
AU - Zeitlin, Jennifer
AU - Weber, Tom
AU - EPICE Research Group
N1 - Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Caesarean section (CS) may reduce mortality and morbidity for very preterm breech infants, but evidence is inconclusive. We evaluated neonatal outcomes for singleton breech infants by mode of delivery in a European cohort.STUDY DESIGN: Data come from the EPICE population-based cohort of very preterm births in 19 regions in 11 European countries (7770 live births). The study population was singleton spontaneous-onset breech births at 24-31 weeks gestational age (GA) without antenatal medical complications requiring caesarean delivery (N = 572). Mixed-effects regression models adjusting for maternal and pregnancy covariates and propensity score matching was used to examine the effect of (1) CS and (2) a unit policy of systematic CS for breech presentation by GA. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, intraventricular haemorrhage grades III & IV or cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Secondary outcomes were each component separately, five minute Apgar score below seven and mortality within six hours of delivery.RESULTS: 64.4% of infants were delivered by CS with a range across regions from 41% to 100%; these infants had higher GA and were more likely to be small for gestational age, receive antenatal steroids, and have mothers who were hospitalised for more than one day before delivery compared to those delivered vaginally. CS was associated with lower risks of all outcomes in mixed-effects adjusted models (odds ratio (OR) for the composite outcome: 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.81), but not in propensity score matched models (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.41; 1.29). A systematic CS policy was associated with lower mortality and morbidity in unadjusted, but not adjusted models (OR for composite outcome: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.44; 1.28). 35% of births 24-25 weeks were delivered by CS and protective effects were consistently stronger, but not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: Point estimates indicated protective effects of caesarean delivery for very preterm breech infants in conventional statistical models. However, analyses using propensity scores and based on unit policies did not confirm statistically significant associations. Prospective large-scale studies are needed to establish best practice and could be implemented in European regions where vaginal delivery remains an option.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Caesarean section (CS) may reduce mortality and morbidity for very preterm breech infants, but evidence is inconclusive. We evaluated neonatal outcomes for singleton breech infants by mode of delivery in a European cohort.STUDY DESIGN: Data come from the EPICE population-based cohort of very preterm births in 19 regions in 11 European countries (7770 live births). The study population was singleton spontaneous-onset breech births at 24-31 weeks gestational age (GA) without antenatal medical complications requiring caesarean delivery (N = 572). Mixed-effects regression models adjusting for maternal and pregnancy covariates and propensity score matching was used to examine the effect of (1) CS and (2) a unit policy of systematic CS for breech presentation by GA. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, intraventricular haemorrhage grades III & IV or cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Secondary outcomes were each component separately, five minute Apgar score below seven and mortality within six hours of delivery.RESULTS: 64.4% of infants were delivered by CS with a range across regions from 41% to 100%; these infants had higher GA and were more likely to be small for gestational age, receive antenatal steroids, and have mothers who were hospitalised for more than one day before delivery compared to those delivered vaginally. CS was associated with lower risks of all outcomes in mixed-effects adjusted models (odds ratio (OR) for the composite outcome: 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.81), but not in propensity score matched models (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.41; 1.29). A systematic CS policy was associated with lower mortality and morbidity in unadjusted, but not adjusted models (OR for composite outcome: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.44; 1.28). 35% of births 24-25 weeks were delivered by CS and protective effects were consistently stronger, but not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: Point estimates indicated protective effects of caesarean delivery for very preterm breech infants in conventional statistical models. However, analyses using propensity scores and based on unit policies did not confirm statistically significant associations. Prospective large-scale studies are needed to establish best practice and could be implemented in European regions where vaginal delivery remains an option.
KW - Breech position
KW - Caesarean delivery
KW - Maternity unit policies
KW - Mode of delivery
KW - Propensity score matching
KW - Very preterm birth
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Gestational Age
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Europe/epidemiology
KW - Perinatal Mortality
KW - Cesarean Section/mortality
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Infant, Extremely Premature
KW - Breech Presentation/mortality
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Cohort Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060250828&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.003
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30682601
SN - 0028-2243
VL - 234
SP - 96
EP - 102
JO - European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
JF - European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ER -