Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Methodology and applicability of the human contact burn injury model: A systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Antigenic and immunogenic evaluation of permutations of soluble hepatitis C virus envelope protein E2 and E1 antigens

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Dancing with atrial fibrillation - How arrhythmia affects everyday life of family members: A qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Endothelial glycocalyx and cardio-renal risk factors in type 1 diabetes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Insulin resistance genetic risk score and burden of coronary artery disease in patients referred for coronary angiography

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Trajectories in severe persistent pain after groin hernia repair: a retrospective analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Characteristics, interventions and longer-term outcomes of COVID-19 ICU patients in Denmark - a nationwide, observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Formodet SARS-CoV-2-dødsfald hos en tidligere rask 50-årig mand

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The contact burn injury model is an experimental contact thermode-based physiological pain model primarily applied in research of drug efficacy in humans. The employment of the contact burn injury model across studies has been inconsistent regarding essential methodological variables, challenging the validity of the model. This systematic review analyzes methodologies, outcomes, and research applications of the contact burn injury model. Based on these results, we propose an improved contact burn injury testing paradigm. A literature search was conducted (15-JUL-2020) using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Sixty-four studies were included. The contact burn injury model induced consistent levels of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. However, the analyses revealed variations in the methodology of the contact burn injury heating paradigm and the post-burn application of test stimuli. The contact burn injury model had limited testing sensitivity in demonstrating analgesic efficacy. There was a weak correlation between experimental and clinical pain intensity variables. The data analysis was limited by the methodological heterogenicity of the different studies and a high risk of bias across the studies. In conclusion, although the contact burn injury model provides robust hyperalgesia, it has limited efficacy in testing analgesic drug response. Recommendations for future use of the model are being provided, but further research is needed to improve the sensitivity of the contact burn injury method. The protocol for this review has been published in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019133734).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere0254790
TidsskriftPLoS One
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)e0254790
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

ID: 67388861