TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction based on individual patient data
AU - Gyöngyösi, Mariann
AU - Wojakowski, Wojciech
AU - Lemarchand, Patricia
AU - Lunde, Ketil
AU - Tendera, Michal
AU - Bartunek, Jozef
AU - Marban, Eduardo
AU - Assmus, Birgit
AU - Henry, Timothy D
AU - Traverse, Jay H
AU - Moyé, Lemuel A
AU - Sürder, Daniel
AU - Corti, Roberto
AU - Huikuri, Heikki
AU - Miettinen, Johanna
AU - Wöhrle, Jochen
AU - Obradovic, Slobodan
AU - Roncalli, Jérome
AU - Malliaras, Konstantinos
AU - Pokushalov, Evgeny
AU - Romanov, Alexander
AU - Kastrup, Jens
AU - Bergmann, Martin W
AU - Atsma, Douwe E
AU - Diederichsen, Axel
AU - Edes, Istvan
AU - Benedek, Imre
AU - Benedek, Theodora
AU - Pejkov, Hristo
AU - Nyolczas, Noemi
AU - Pavo, Noemi
AU - Bergler-Klein, Jutta
AU - Pavo, Imre J
AU - Sylven, Christer
AU - Berti, Sergio
AU - Navarese, Eliano P
AU - Maurer, Gerald
AU - ACCRUE Investigators
N1 - © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2015/4/10
Y1 - 2015/4/10
N2 - RATIONALE: The meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac study is the first prospectively declared collaborative multinational database, including individual data of patients with ischemic heart disease treated with cell therapy.OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252).METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary end point was freedom from combined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (including all-cause death, AMI recurrance, stroke, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary end point was freedom from hard clinical end points (death, AMI recurrence, or stroke), assessed with random-effects meta-analyses and Cox regressions for interactions. Secondary efficacy end points included changes in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses and ANCOVA. We reported weighted mean differences between cell therapy and control groups. No effect of cell therapy on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (14.0% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.18) or death (1.4% versus 2.1%) or death/AMI recurrence/stroke (2.9% versus 4.7%) was identified in comparison with controls. No changes in ejection fraction (mean difference: 0.96%; 95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 2.1), end-diastolic volume, or systolic volume were observed compared with controls. These results were not influenced by anterior AMI location, reduced baseline ejection fraction, or the use of MRI for assessing left ventricular parameters.CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials in patients with recent AMI revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided no benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01098591.
AB - RATIONALE: The meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac study is the first prospectively declared collaborative multinational database, including individual data of patients with ischemic heart disease treated with cell therapy.OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252).METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary end point was freedom from combined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (including all-cause death, AMI recurrance, stroke, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary end point was freedom from hard clinical end points (death, AMI recurrence, or stroke), assessed with random-effects meta-analyses and Cox regressions for interactions. Secondary efficacy end points included changes in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses and ANCOVA. We reported weighted mean differences between cell therapy and control groups. No effect of cell therapy on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (14.0% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.18) or death (1.4% versus 2.1%) or death/AMI recurrence/stroke (2.9% versus 4.7%) was identified in comparison with controls. No changes in ejection fraction (mean difference: 0.96%; 95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 2.1), end-diastolic volume, or systolic volume were observed compared with controls. These results were not influenced by anterior AMI location, reduced baseline ejection fraction, or the use of MRI for assessing left ventricular parameters.CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials in patients with recent AMI revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided no benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01098591.
KW - Aged
KW - Bone Marrow Transplantation
KW - Cerebrovascular Disorders
KW - Chi-Square Distribution
KW - Databases, Factual
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Myocardial Contraction
KW - Myocardial Infarction
KW - Myocardium
KW - Proportional Hazards Models
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Recovery of Function
KW - Recurrence
KW - Regeneration
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Stroke Volume
KW - Time Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Ventricular Function, Left
KW - Ventricular Remodeling
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304346
DO - 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304346
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25700037
SN - 0009-7330
VL - 116
SP - 1346
EP - 1360
JO - Circulation Research
JF - Circulation Research
IS - 8
ER -