Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Laura Juul Madsen, E Oma, L N Jorgensen, K K Jensen

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mesh repair of umbilical hernia has been associated with a reduced recurrence rate compared with suture closure, but potentially at the expense of increased postoperative complications and chronic pain. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the outcomes after elective open mesh and suture repair for umbilical hernia in adults.

METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify studies presenting original data on elective open mesh and suture repair of umbilical hernia. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection (SSI), seroma, haematoma and chronic pain. Meta-analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS: The search resulted in 5353 hits and led to 14 studies being included (6 RCTs and 8 observational studies) describing a total of 2361 patients. Compared with suture, mesh repair was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 0·48, 95 per cent c.i. 0·30 to 0·77), with number needed to treat 19 (95 per cent c.i. 14 to 31). Mesh repair was associated with a higher risk of seroma (RR 2·37, 1·45 to 3·87), with number needed to harm 30 (17 to 86). There was no significant difference in the risk of SSI, haematoma or chronic pain.

CONCLUSION: The use of mesh in elective repair of umbilical hernia reduced the risk of recurrence compared with suture closure without altering the risk of chronic pain.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBJS open
Vol/bind4
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)369-379
Antal sider11
ISSN2474-9842
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2020

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater