Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

Ann Hou Sæter; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg; Kristoffer Andresen

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD015160

Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

Ann Hou Sæter^*, Siv Fonnes, Jacob Rosenberg, Kristoffer Andresen

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Afdeling for Mave-, Tarm- og Leversygdomme HGH

7 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	CD015160
Tidsskrift	Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Vol/bind	2022
Udgave nummer	6
Sider (fra-til)	1-13
Antal sider	13
ISSN	1465-1858
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015160
Status	Udgivet - 24 jun. 2022

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1002/14651858.CD015160

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

@article{0ef20b9a5d4e40d58980e33a289cdc3e,

title = "Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair",

abstract = "Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.",

author = "S{\ae}ter, {Ann Hou} and Siv Fonnes and Jacob Rosenberg and Kristoffer Andresen",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",

year = "2022",

month = jun,

day = "24",

doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD015160",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

pages = "1--13",

journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1465-1858",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

AU - Sæter, Ann Hou

AU - Fonnes, Siv

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

AU - Andresen, Kristoffer

PY - 2022/6/24

Y1 - 2022/6/24

N2 - Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

AB - Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133196979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD015160

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD015160

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85133196979

SN - 1465-1858

VL - 2022

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

IS - 6

M1 - CD015160

ER -

Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater