TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate
AU - Linde, F
AU - Nørgaard, P
AU - Hvid, I
AU - Odgaard, A
AU - Søballe, K
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - The effect of strain rate (epsilon) and apparent density (rho) on stiffness (E), strength (sigma u), and ultimate strain (epsilon u) was studied in 60 human trabecular bone specimens from the proximal tibia. Testing was performed by uniaxial compression to 5% specimen strain. Six different strain rates were used: 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 s-1. Apparent density ranged between 0.23 and 0.59 g cm-3. Linear and non-linear regression analyses using strength, stiffness and ultimate strain as dependent variables (Y) and strain rate and apparent density as independent variables were performed using the following models: Y = a rho b epsilon c, Y = rho b(a + c epsilon; Y = (a + b rho)epsilon c, Y = a rho 2 epsilon c, E = a rho 3 epsilon c. The variations of strength and stiffness were explained equally well by the linear and the power function relationship to strain rate. The exponent was 0.07 in the power function relationship between strength and strain rate and 0.05 between stiffness and strain rate. The variation of ultimate strain was explained best using a power function relationship to strain rate (exponent = 0.03). The variation of strength and stiffness was explained equally well by the linear, power function and quadratic relationship to apparent density. The cubic relationship between stiffness and apparent density showed a less good fit. Ultimate strain varied independently of apparent density.
AB - The effect of strain rate (epsilon) and apparent density (rho) on stiffness (E), strength (sigma u), and ultimate strain (epsilon u) was studied in 60 human trabecular bone specimens from the proximal tibia. Testing was performed by uniaxial compression to 5% specimen strain. Six different strain rates were used: 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 s-1. Apparent density ranged between 0.23 and 0.59 g cm-3. Linear and non-linear regression analyses using strength, stiffness and ultimate strain as dependent variables (Y) and strain rate and apparent density as independent variables were performed using the following models: Y = a rho b epsilon c, Y = rho b(a + c epsilon; Y = (a + b rho)epsilon c, Y = a rho 2 epsilon c, E = a rho 3 epsilon c. The variations of strength and stiffness were explained equally well by the linear and the power function relationship to strain rate. The exponent was 0.07 in the power function relationship between strength and strain rate and 0.05 between stiffness and strain rate. The variation of ultimate strain was explained best using a power function relationship to strain rate (exponent = 0.03). The variation of strength and stiffness was explained equally well by the linear, power function and quadratic relationship to apparent density. The cubic relationship between stiffness and apparent density showed a less good fit. Ultimate strain varied independently of apparent density.
KW - Aged
KW - Biomechanical Phenomena
KW - Bone Density/physiology
KW - Bone and Bones/physiology
KW - Epiphyses/physiology
KW - Humans
KW - Knee Joint/physiology
KW - Male
KW - Tensile Strength/physiology
KW - Tibia/physiology
KW - Weight-Bearing/physiology
U2 - 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90305-7
DO - 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90305-7
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 1752864
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 24
SP - 803
EP - 809
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 9
ER -