TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical dyssynchrony
T2 - How do we measure it, what it means, and what we can do about it
AU - Fudim, Marat
AU - Dalgaard, Frederik
AU - Fathallah, Mouhammad
AU - Iskandrian, Ami E
AU - Borges-Neto, Salvator
N1 - © 2019. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) is defined by a difference in the timing of mechanical contraction or relaxation between different segments of the left ventricle (LV). Mechanical dyssynchrony is distinct from electrical dyssynchrony as measured by QRS duration and has been of increasing interest due to its association with worse prognosis and potential role in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Although echocardiography is the most used modality to assess LVMD, some limitations apply to this modality. Compared to echo-based modalities, nuclear imaging by gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has clear advantages in evaluating systolic and diastolic LVMD. GSPECT MPI can determine systolic and diastolic mechanical dyssynchrony by the variability in the timing in which different LV segments contract or relax, which has prognostic impact in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. As such, by targeting mechanical dyssynchrony instead of electrical dyssynchrony, GSPECT MPI can potentially improve patient selection for CRT. So far, few studies have investigated the role of diastolic dyssynchrony, but recent evidence seems to suggest high prevalence and more prognostic impact than previously recognized. In the present review, we provide an oversight of mechanical dyssynchrony.
AB - Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) is defined by a difference in the timing of mechanical contraction or relaxation between different segments of the left ventricle (LV). Mechanical dyssynchrony is distinct from electrical dyssynchrony as measured by QRS duration and has been of increasing interest due to its association with worse prognosis and potential role in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Although echocardiography is the most used modality to assess LVMD, some limitations apply to this modality. Compared to echo-based modalities, nuclear imaging by gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has clear advantages in evaluating systolic and diastolic LVMD. GSPECT MPI can determine systolic and diastolic mechanical dyssynchrony by the variability in the timing in which different LV segments contract or relax, which has prognostic impact in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. As such, by targeting mechanical dyssynchrony instead of electrical dyssynchrony, GSPECT MPI can potentially improve patient selection for CRT. So far, few studies have investigated the role of diastolic dyssynchrony, but recent evidence seems to suggest high prevalence and more prognostic impact than previously recognized. In the present review, we provide an oversight of mechanical dyssynchrony.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066624522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12350-019-01758-0
DO - 10.1007/s12350-019-01758-0
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31144228
SN - 1071-3581
VL - 28
SP - 2174
EP - 2184
JO - Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
JF - Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -