Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Meaningful Change Scores in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Infographic. Exercise therapy for meniscal tears: evidence and recommendations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Lina Holm Ingelsrud
  • Caroline B Terwee
  • Berend Terluin
  • Lars-Petter Granan
  • Lars Engebretsen
  • Kathryn A G Mills
  • Ewa M Roos
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Meaningful change scores in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not yet been established.

PURPOSE: To define the minimal important change (MIC) for the KOOS after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS: KOOS and anchor questions with 7-point scales ranging from "better, an important improvement" to "worse, an important worsening" were completed postoperatively by randomly chosen participants from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry. Presurgery KOOS scores were retrieved from the registry. The MIC for improvement was calculated with anchor-based approaches using the predictive modeling method adjusted for the proportion of improved patients, the mean change method, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method.

RESULTS: Complete data for at least one of the KOOS subscales were obtained from 542 (45.3%) participants. Predictive modeling MIC values were 12.1 for the KOOS subscales of Sport and Recreational Function and 18.3 for Knee-Related Quality of Life. These values aid in interpreting within-group improvement over time and can be used as responder criteria when comparing groups. The corresponding and much lower values for the subscales of Pain (2.5), Symptoms (-1.2), and Activities of Daily Living (2.4) are the results from patients reporting, on average, only mild problems with these domains preoperatively. Although 4% to 10% of patients reported subscale-specific worsening, MIC deterioration calculations were not possible. The ROC MIC values were associated with high degrees of misclassification. Values obtained by the mean change method were considered less reliable because these estimates are derived from subgroups of patients. Average KOOS change scores were approximately similar for patients reporting acceptable symptoms postoperatively and patients reporting important improvements on the anchor items after surgery.

CONCLUSION: KOOS users should apply subscale-specific cutoffs for meaningful improvement. Our results confirm using the subscales of Sport and Recreational Function and Knee-Related Quality of Life as primary patient-reported outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The predictive modeling approach gave the most robust estimates of MIC values. Our data suggest that reporting acceptable symptoms postoperatively corresponds to reporting an important improvement after ACL reconstruction.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe American journal of sports medicine
Vol/bind46
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)1120-1128
Antal sider9
ISSN0363-5465
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 8 mar. 2018

ID: 53547768