TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping of Former Strategies and Future Needs for Regulatory Prevention of Skin Sensitization
T2 - Cosmetic Products
AU - Pedersen, Mathias Krogh
AU - Schwensen, Jakob Ferløv Baselius
AU - Alfonso, Jose Hernán
AU - Mollerup, Steen
AU - Selvestrel, Gianluca
AU - Rudén, Christina
AU - Wilks, Martin F.
AU - Johansen, Jeanne Duus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Contact allergy related to use of cosmetic products remains a considerable problem in the European Union population. The objectives of this study were to identify pitfalls in EU risk assessment methodologies and regulation(s) for cosmetic products and identify areas of potential improvements in future regulatory strategies. Two significant contact allergens, methylisothiazolinone and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, were investigated as examples. Other contact allergens were used to provide additional context. Opinions from the European Commission's scientific committees and regulatory documents were analysed to identify methodologies, processes and results in terms of preventive effects. The analysis revealed key observations in five areas: risk assessment methodologies, prediction approaches, key data, regulatory process and linkages. The case study indicated that reliance on predictive sensitization data from healthy volunteers generated unrealistically high no/low effect levels, while epidemiological surveillance and patient-based threshold data ultimately proved decisive, informing EU restrictions that led to declining sensitization rates. Read across approaches and chemical alert analyses show potential for earlier prevention, but their application has been inconsistent. Quantitative risk assessment remains limited by unresolved issues such as safety factors, aggregate exposure, and mixture effects. Strengthening transparency, integrating clinical evidence earlier, and improving regulatory coordination are essential to prevent future sensitization epidemics.
AB - Contact allergy related to use of cosmetic products remains a considerable problem in the European Union population. The objectives of this study were to identify pitfalls in EU risk assessment methodologies and regulation(s) for cosmetic products and identify areas of potential improvements in future regulatory strategies. Two significant contact allergens, methylisothiazolinone and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde, were investigated as examples. Other contact allergens were used to provide additional context. Opinions from the European Commission's scientific committees and regulatory documents were analysed to identify methodologies, processes and results in terms of preventive effects. The analysis revealed key observations in five areas: risk assessment methodologies, prediction approaches, key data, regulatory process and linkages. The case study indicated that reliance on predictive sensitization data from healthy volunteers generated unrealistically high no/low effect levels, while epidemiological surveillance and patient-based threshold data ultimately proved decisive, informing EU restrictions that led to declining sensitization rates. Read across approaches and chemical alert analyses show potential for earlier prevention, but their application has been inconsistent. Quantitative risk assessment remains limited by unresolved issues such as safety factors, aggregate exposure, and mixture effects. Strengthening transparency, integrating clinical evidence earlier, and improving regulatory coordination are essential to prevent future sensitization epidemics.
KW - cosmetic products
KW - hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde
KW - methylisothiazolinone
KW - quantitative risk assessment
KW - risk assessment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041043681
U2 - 10.1111/cod.70197
DO - 10.1111/cod.70197
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 42252727
AN - SCOPUS:105041043681
SN - 0105-1873
JO - Contact Dermatitis
JF - Contact Dermatitis
ER -