TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of obstructive sleep apnea in Europe - A 10-year follow-up
AU - Fietze, Ingo
AU - Laharnar, Naima
AU - Bargiotas, Panagiotis
AU - Basoglu, Ozen K
AU - Dogas, Zoran
AU - Drummond, Marta
AU - Fanfulla, Francesco
AU - Gislason, Thorarinn
AU - Gouveris, Haralampos
AU - Grote, Ludger
AU - Hein, Holger
AU - Jennum, Poul
AU - Joppa, Pavol
AU - van Kralingen, Klaas
AU - Kvamme, John Arthur
AU - Lombardi, Carolina
AU - Ludka, Ondrej
AU - Mallin, Wolfgang
AU - Marrone, Oreste
AU - McNicholas, Walter T
AU - Mihaicuta, Stefan
AU - Montserrat, Josep
AU - Pillar, Giora
AU - Pataka, Athanasia
AU - Randerath, Winfried
AU - Riha, Renata L
AU - Roisman, Gabriel
AU - Saaresranta, Tarja
AU - Schiza, Sophia E
AU - Sliwinski, Pawel
AU - Svaza, Juris
AU - Steiropoulos, Paschalis
AU - Tamisier, Renauld
AU - Testelmans, Dries
AU - Trakada, Georgia
AU - Verbraecken, Johan
AU - Zablockis, Rolandas
AU - Penzel, Thomas
N1 - Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - OBJECTIVE: In 2010, a questionnaire-based study on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management in Europe identified differences regarding reimbursement, sleep specialist qualification, and titration procedures. Now, 10 years later, a follow-up study was conducted as part of the ESADA (European Sleep Apnea Database) network to explore the development of OSA management over time.METHODS: The 2010 questionnaire including questions on sleep diagnostic, reimbursement, treatment, and certification was updated with questions on telemedicine and distributed to European Sleep Centers to reflect European OSA management practice.RESULTS: 26 countries (36 sleep centers) participated, representing 20 ESADA and 6 non-ESADA countries. All 21 countries from the 2010 survey participated. In 2010, OSA diagnostic procedures were performed mainly by specialized physicians (86%), whereas now mainly by certified sleep specialists and specialized physicians (69%). Treatment and titration procedures are currently quite homogenous, with a strong trend towards more Autotitrating Positive Airway Pressure treatment (in hospital 73%, at home 62%). From 2010 to 2020, home sleep apnea testing use increased (76%-89%) and polysomnography as sole diagnostic procedure decreased (24%-12%). Availability of a sleep specialist qualification increased (52%-65%) as well as the number of certified polysomnography scorers (certified physicians: 36%-79%; certified technicians: 20%-62%). Telemedicine, not surveyed in 2010, is now in 2020 used in diagnostics (8%), treatment (50%), and follow-up (73%).CONCLUSION: In the past decade, formal qualification of sleep center personnel increased, OSA diagnostic and treatment procedures shifted towards a more automatic approach, and telemedicine became more prominent.
AB - OBJECTIVE: In 2010, a questionnaire-based study on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management in Europe identified differences regarding reimbursement, sleep specialist qualification, and titration procedures. Now, 10 years later, a follow-up study was conducted as part of the ESADA (European Sleep Apnea Database) network to explore the development of OSA management over time.METHODS: The 2010 questionnaire including questions on sleep diagnostic, reimbursement, treatment, and certification was updated with questions on telemedicine and distributed to European Sleep Centers to reflect European OSA management practice.RESULTS: 26 countries (36 sleep centers) participated, representing 20 ESADA and 6 non-ESADA countries. All 21 countries from the 2010 survey participated. In 2010, OSA diagnostic procedures were performed mainly by specialized physicians (86%), whereas now mainly by certified sleep specialists and specialized physicians (69%). Treatment and titration procedures are currently quite homogenous, with a strong trend towards more Autotitrating Positive Airway Pressure treatment (in hospital 73%, at home 62%). From 2010 to 2020, home sleep apnea testing use increased (76%-89%) and polysomnography as sole diagnostic procedure decreased (24%-12%). Availability of a sleep specialist qualification increased (52%-65%) as well as the number of certified polysomnography scorers (certified physicians: 36%-79%; certified technicians: 20%-62%). Telemedicine, not surveyed in 2010, is now in 2020 used in diagnostics (8%), treatment (50%), and follow-up (73%).CONCLUSION: In the past decade, formal qualification of sleep center personnel increased, OSA diagnostic and treatment procedures shifted towards a more automatic approach, and telemedicine became more prominent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133273153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.06.001
DO - 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.06.001
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35724441
SN - 1389-9457
VL - 97
SP - 64
EP - 72
JO - Sleep Medicine
JF - Sleep Medicine
ER -