TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the Nordic countries
T2 - A survey of uro-oncological centers
AU - Nolsøe, Alexander Bjørneboe
AU - Holm, Henriette Veiby
AU - Murtola, Teemu J
AU - Østergren, Peter Busch
AU - Fode, Mikkel
N1 - © 2023. The Author(s).
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - We aimed to describe the clinical practice regarding erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy in the Nordic countries. A 37-item survey about pre- and post-prostatectomy evaluation and rehabilitation of sexual and urinary function was sent to 42 uro-oncology centers. Reporting was done according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Twenty-seven centers in Denmark (n = 6), Norway (n = 8), Finland (n = 7), and Sweden (n = 6) responded (64.3%). Post-prostatectomy sexual function was evaluated by 25 centers. The majority used validated questionnaires with significant variations across centers. Post-prostatectomy urinary function was evaluated by 24 centers. Again, the majority used validated questionnaires, while 9 centers used objective measures including uroflowmetry, residual urine volume, and pad usage. Twenty-one centers offered sexual rehabilitation and 12 of these described their protocols. All centers administered phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and seven centers offered further treatment options. Two centers offered a consultation with a sexologist. Twenty-three centers provided pelvic floor muscle training and one center used medical support with duloxetine. Our study indicates a need for standardized evaluation and management of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Especially, there is a need for an increased focus on comprehensive sexual rehabilitation.
AB - We aimed to describe the clinical practice regarding erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy in the Nordic countries. A 37-item survey about pre- and post-prostatectomy evaluation and rehabilitation of sexual and urinary function was sent to 42 uro-oncology centers. Reporting was done according to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Twenty-seven centers in Denmark (n = 6), Norway (n = 8), Finland (n = 7), and Sweden (n = 6) responded (64.3%). Post-prostatectomy sexual function was evaluated by 25 centers. The majority used validated questionnaires with significant variations across centers. Post-prostatectomy urinary function was evaluated by 24 centers. Again, the majority used validated questionnaires, while 9 centers used objective measures including uroflowmetry, residual urine volume, and pad usage. Twenty-one centers offered sexual rehabilitation and 12 of these described their protocols. All centers administered phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and seven centers offered further treatment options. Two centers offered a consultation with a sexologist. Twenty-three centers provided pelvic floor muscle training and one center used medical support with duloxetine. Our study indicates a need for standardized evaluation and management of erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Especially, there is a need for an increased focus on comprehensive sexual rehabilitation.
KW - Erectile Dysfunction/etiology
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Postoperative Complications
KW - Prostatectomy/adverse effects
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery
KW - Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Urinary Incontinence/surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173718692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41443-023-00772-8
DO - 10.1038/s41443-023-00772-8
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37816870
SN - 0955-9930
VL - 36
SP - 486
EP - 492
JO - International Journal of Impotence Research
JF - International Journal of Impotence Research
IS - 5
ER -