Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Lung Ultrasound in the Assessment of Pulmonary Complications After Lung Transplantation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. When Are Trainees Ready to Perform Transvaginal Ultrasound? An Observational Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Machine learning and deep learning applied in ultrasound

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  3. Looking back at EUROSON 2016 in Leipzig, Germany: which topics were popular?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Torque-Teno virus viral load as a potential endogenous marker of immune function in solid organ transplantation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging allows differentiation of low-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Chronic pain after bilateral thoracotomy in lung transplant patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION:  Lung ultrasound (LUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for identifying frequent conditions in the post-operative phase after lung transplantation (LTx). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and clinical ability of LUS to identify pulmonary complications such as pleural effusions and pneumonias in the early postoperative phase after LTx.

METHODS:  A prospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients who consecutively underwent single LTx (SLTx) or double LTx (DLTx) at the National Lung Transplantation Center in Denmark from May 1 to October 31, 2015 was conducted. LUS was performed at four time points corresponding to post-transplant day 3, and weeks 2, 6, and 12 (LUS #1 - 4) to detect and monitor variation in pathological LUS findings over time. Concurrent with LUS #4, a high-resolution computed tomography examination of the thorax (HRCT) was also performed.

RESULTS:  14 patients (1 SLTx/13 DLTx, 7 (50 %) women, mean age: 50.4 years) who had undergone the four prespecified LUS examinations were included. Pleural effusion was the most common condition and most pronounced at post-LTx week 2. Findings consistent with pneumonia increased during week 2 and subsequently decreased. Corresponding to LUS #1, 2, 3, and 4, pleural effusion occurred in 85.7 %, 92.9 %, 85.7 %, and 78.6 %, and pneumonia in 21.4 %, 28.6 %, 14.3 %, and 14.3 %, respectively. HRCT findings at post-LTx week 12 were predominantly presented by unspecific ground glass opacities.

CONCLUSION:  In a post-LTx setting, LUS represents a clinical novelty as a feasible diagnostic and monitoring tool to identify pathological pulmonary complications in the early post-operative phase.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftUltraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)
Sider (fra-til)epub
ISSN0172-4614
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

ID: 56232561