Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Lower vs. higher fluid volumes in sepsis-protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Continuous vital sign monitoring after major abdominal surgery-Quantification of micro events

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Corticosteroids and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill adults: Protocol for a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Pre-operative haemodynamic monitoring and resuscitation in hip fracture patients: Protocol for a prospective observational study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. The association between pre-operative sepsis and 30-day mortality in hip fracture patients-A cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Corticosteroids and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill adults: Protocol for a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. The Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Therapy and Body Temperature on Surgical Site Infection - Re-Assessment of a Randomized Trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Statens investeringer i kliniske forsøg

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluid administration with crystalloids is recommended in the initial management of sepsis. However, the quality of evidence supporting the recommendation on fluid volumes is low, and clinical equipoise exists. Potential benefits of restricting fluid volumes has been suggested, but the overall benefit or harm in patients with sepsis is unknown. Accordingly, we aim to assess patient-important benefits and harms of lower vs. higher fluid volumes in resuscitation of adult patients with sepsis.

METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing different strategies to obtain separation in fluid volumes or balances during resuscitation of adult patients with sepsis. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, BIOSIS and Epistemonikos for relevant literature. We will follow the recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The risk of systematic errors (bias) and random errors will be assessed, and the overall quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION: The outlined systematic review will provide important data on how patient-important outcomes are affected by higher vs. lower resuscitation fluid volumes in adults with sepsis. Using trial sequential analysis to assess the risk of random errors will increase the validity of the summary estimates calculated and help estimate the required information size for future trials.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind61
Tidsskriftsnummer8
Sider (fra-til)942-951
Antal sider10
ISSN0001-5172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2017

ID: 51522142