Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Low validity of the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared to indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. A quality of life questionnaire for patients with scapula alata (SA-Q): development and validation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Responsiveness of clinical tests for people with neck pain

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Andreas Hermann
  • Mathias Ried-Larsen
  • Andreas Kryger Jensen
  • René Holst
  • Lars Bo Andersen
  • Søren Overgaard
  • Anders Holsgaard-Larsen
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: To validate physical activity estimates by the Sensewear Pro3 activity monitor compared with indirect calorimetry during simulated free living in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the hip pre or post total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis (10 pre- and 10 post total hip arthroplasty; 40% female; age: 63.3 ± 9.0; BMI: 23.7 ± 3.7). All patients completed a 2 hour protocol of simulated free living with 8 different typical physical activity types. Energy consumption (kcal/min) was estimated by the Sense Wear pro3 Armband activity monitor and validated against indirect calorimetry (criterion method) by means of a portable unit (Cosmed K4b2). Bias and variance was analyzed using functional ANOVA.

RESULTS: Mean bias during all activities was 1.5 Kcal/min 95%CI [1.3; 1.8] corresponding to 72% (overestimation). Normal gait speed showed an overestimation of 2.8 Kcal/min, 95%CI [2.3; 3.3] (93%) while an underestimation of -1.1 Kcal/min, 95%CI [-1.8; -0.3] (-25%) was recorded during stair climb. Activities dominated by upper body movements showed large overestimation with 4.37 Kcal/min, 95%CI [3.8; 5.1] (170%) being recorded during gardening. Both bias and variance appeared to be dependent on activity type.

CONCLUSION: The activity monitor generally overestimated the energy consumption during common activities of low to medium intensity in the patient group. The size and direction of the bias was highly dependent on the activity type which indicates the activity monitor is of limited value in patients with hip osteoarthritis and that the results do not express the real energy expenditure.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftB M C Musculoskeletal Disorders
Vol/bind15
Sider (fra-til)43
ISSN1471-2474
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014

ID: 44364481