Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Long-term impact of baseline anaemia on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Catheter ablation and mortality, stroke and heart failure readmission with atrial fibrillation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Coronary risk of patients with valvular heart disease: prospective validation of CT-Valve Score

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Living with heart failure: perspectives of ethnic minority families

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Incidence of acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock during corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cause of death in Danish living kidney donors: matched cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Recurrent infective endocarditis versus first-time infective endocarditis after heart valve surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Time trends in incidence, comorbidity, and mortality of ischemic stroke in Denmark, 1996-2016

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Prevalence and incidence of various Cancer subtypes in patients with heart failure vs matched controls

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Line Davidsen
  • Kristian Hay Kragholm
  • Mette Aldahl
  • Christoffer Polcwiartek
  • Christian Torp-Pedersen
  • Peter Soegaard
  • Phillip Freeman
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: In patients with stable angina (SA), the clinical benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reside almost exclusively within the realm of symptomatic improvement rather than improvement in hard clinical endpoints. The benefits of PCI should always be balanced against its potential short-term and long-term risks. Common among these risks is the presence of anaemia and its interaction with poor clinical outcomes and increased morbidity; this study aims to elucidate the impact of anaemia on long-term clinical outcomes of this patient group.

METHODS: From Danish national registries, we identified patients with SA treated with PCI who had a haemoglobin measurement maximum of 90 days prior to PCI procedure. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <130 and <120 g/L in men and women, respectively. Follow-up was up to 3 years after PCI, and Cox regression was used to estimate HRs with 95% CIs of hospitalisation due to bleeding, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and all-cause mortality in patients with anaemia compared with patients without anaemia.

RESULTS: Of 2837 included patients, 14.6% had anaemia prior to PCI. During follow-up, 93 patients (3.3%) had a bleeding episode, which was higher in patients with anaemia (5.8%) compared with patients without anaemia (2.8%). A total of 213 patients (7.5%) developed ACS, which was higher in patients with anaemia (10.6%) compared with patients without anaemia (7.0%). Furthermore, 185 patients (6.5%) died, with a mortality rate of 18.1% in patients with anaemia compared with 4.5% in patients without anaemia. In multivariable analyses, anaemia was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.73; P 0.033), ACS (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.10; P 0.031) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.73 to 3.30; P <0.001).

CONCLUSION: Anaemia in patients with SA was significantly associated with bleeding, ACS and all-cause mortality following PCI.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere001319
TidsskriftOpen Heart
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer2
ISSN2053-3624
DOI
StatusUdgivet - okt. 2020

Bibliografisk note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 60964410