Abstract
AIMS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). How CKD influences the benefit-risk balance of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) is less known. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the multicentre BASKET-PROVE trial, 2314 patients in need of large coronary stenting (≥3.0mm) were randomised 2:1 to DES or BMS. In an a priori planned secondary analysis, outcomes were evaluated according to renal function defined by estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR; normal: eGFR≥60ml/min/1.73m(2); CKD: eGFR
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | International Journal of Cardiology Research |
| Vol/bind | 20 |
| Udgave nummer | 6 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 2381-8 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 3 okt. 2013 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Long-term benefits and risks of drug-eluting compared to bare-metal stents in patients with versus without chronic kidney disease'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS