TY - JOUR
T1 - Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation
T2 - a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial
AU - Feinberg, Joshua Buron
AU - Olsen, Michael Hecht
AU - Brandes, Axel
AU - Raymond, Llan
AU - Nielsen, Walter Bjørn
AU - Nielsen, Emil Eik
AU - Stensgaard-Hansen, Frank
AU - Dixen, Ulrik
AU - Pedersen, Ole Dyg
AU - Gang, Uffe Jakob Ortved
AU - Gluud, Christian
AU - Jakobsen, Janus Christian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/31
Y1 - 2021/3/31
N2 - Introduction Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. In many patients, a rate control strategy is recommended. The optimal heart rate target is disputed despite the results of the the RAte Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between lenient vs strict rate control II (RACE II) trial. Our primary objective will be to investigate the effect of lenient rate control strategy (<110 beats per minute (bpm) at rest) compared with strict rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest) on quality of life in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation. Methods and analysis We plan a two-group, superiority randomised clinical trial. 350 outpatients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation will be recruited from four hospitals, across three regions in Denmark. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to a lenient medical rate control strategy (<110 bpm at rest) or a strict medical rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest). The recruitment phase is planned to be 2 years with 3 years of follow-up. Recruitment is expected to start in January 2021. The primary outcome will be quality of life using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire (physical component score). Secondary outcomes will be days alive outside hospital, symptom control using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life, quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire (mental component score) and serious adverse events. The primary assessment time point for all outcomes will be 1 year after randomisation. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained through the ethics committee in Region Zealand. The design and findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals as well as be made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial registration number NCT04542785.
AB - Introduction Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. In many patients, a rate control strategy is recommended. The optimal heart rate target is disputed despite the results of the the RAte Control Efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between lenient vs strict rate control II (RACE II) trial. Our primary objective will be to investigate the effect of lenient rate control strategy (<110 beats per minute (bpm) at rest) compared with strict rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest) on quality of life in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation. Methods and analysis We plan a two-group, superiority randomised clinical trial. 350 outpatients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation will be recruited from four hospitals, across three regions in Denmark. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to a lenient medical rate control strategy (<110 bpm at rest) or a strict medical rate control strategy (<80 bpm at rest). The recruitment phase is planned to be 2 years with 3 years of follow-up. Recruitment is expected to start in January 2021. The primary outcome will be quality of life using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire (physical component score). Secondary outcomes will be days alive outside hospital, symptom control using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life, quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire (mental component score) and serious adverse events. The primary assessment time point for all outcomes will be 1 year after randomisation. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained through the ethics committee in Region Zealand. The design and findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals as well as be made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial registration number NCT04542785.
KW - adult cardiology
KW - cardiology
KW - pacing & electrophysiology
KW - Denmark/epidemiology
KW - Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103617692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33789853
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 3
M1 - 044744
ER -