Legal obstacles jeopardise research in personalised medicine - experiences from a Nordic collaboration within rheumatology

Bente Glintborg*, Mats Hansson, Hilde Berner Hammer, Lars Klareskog, Saedis Saevarsdottir, Helga Westerlind, Johan Rönnelid, Isabel Gehring, Mikael Benson, Bente Appel Esbensen, Merete Lund Hetland, Leonid Padyukov, Tue Wenzel Kragstrup, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Barbara Bislawska AxnÄs, Niels Steen Krogh, Martina Johannesson, Johan Askling

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Abstract

AIMS: Personalised medicine in chronic complex diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is within reach but requires international multi-stakeholder collaboration. We exemplify how national implementations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have introduced administrative delays and created disincentives for data sharing and collaborative research.

METHODS: Our Danish/Swedish/Norwegian research collaboration (the 3-year NordForsk-funded "NORA" project) aims to develop a personalised medicine approach for the management of RA, built on the exploitation of unique existing data sources: longitudinal data from clinical rheumatology registries, research cohorts, nationwide health care registries, and biobank material from >20 sample collections. Data and results are shared and accessed remotely by collaborators at secure servers. New biomarker assays and patient-centric implementations of the results are to be explored, validated, and disseminated to patients and health care via the development of digital tools.

RESULTS: Following the advice of legal experts at the involved academic or public institutions and private companies, GDPR compliance resulted in >20 legal documents to govern the collaboration (consortium-, joint controller-, research collaboration-, data sharing-, and a series of unique two-way data processing-, and material transfer agreements). Lack of agreed-upon templates, policies, procedures, and a shortage of legal resources have caused considerable delays. Thus, our research consortium has spent more time ensuring GDPR compliance than on actual research activities.

CONCLUSIONS: The current interpretation and implementation of the legal premises (rather than the GDPR per se) for research collaborations caused unnecessary barriers and delays. Our experiences call for Nordic trust-based code-of-conduct-like framework agreements, and for harmonisation of procedures and templates, lest the Nordic advantage in research be lost.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
BogserieScandinavian Journal of Public Health. Supplement
Vol/bind52
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)1019-1025
Antal sider7
ISSN1403-4956
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Legal obstacles jeopardise research in personalised medicine - experiences from a Nordic collaboration within rheumatology'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater