Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Left axis deviation in patients with left bundle branch block is a marker of myocardial disease associated with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Assessment of patients with a suspected cardioembolic ischemic stroke. A national consensus statement

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Acute hypoglycemia and risk of cardiac arrhythmias in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and controls

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Proposal for the use of echocardiography in bloodstream infections due to different streptococcal species

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: Patients with left axis deviation (LAD) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) show less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to other LBBB-patients. This study investigates the reasons for this.

METHODS: Sixty-eight patients eligible for CRT were included. Patients were divided into groups according to QRS-axis; normal axis (NA), left axis deviation (LAD) and right axis deviation (RAD). Before CRT implantation CMR imaging was performed to evaluate scar tissue. Echocardiography was performed before and after implantation. The electrical substrate was assessed by measuring interlead electrical delays. Response was evaluated after 8 months by left ventricular (LV) remodelling and clinical response.

RESULTS: Forty-four (65%) patients were responders in terms of LV remodelling. The presence of LAD was found to be independently associated with a poor LV remodelling non-response OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06-0.77] (p = 0.02). Patients with axis deviation had more myocardial scar tissue (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 0.9 ± 0.6, P = 0.04), more severe LV hypertrophy (14 (64%) and 6 (60%) vs. 7 (29%), P = 0.05) and tended to have a shorter interlead electrical delay than patients with NA (79 ± 40 ms vs. 92 ± 48 ms, P = 0.07). A high scar tissue burden was more pronounced in non-responders (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: LAD in the presence of LBBB is a predictor of poor outcome after CRT. Patients with LBBB and LAD have more scar tissue, hypertrophy and less activation delay.

TidsskriftJournal of Electrocardiology
Sider (fra-til)147-152
Antal sider6
StatusUdgivet - 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 59170001