Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Left axis deviation in patients with left bundle branch block is a marker of myocardial disease associated with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence of Infective Endocarditis in Streptococcal Bloodstream Infections is Dependent on Streptococcal Species

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Valve regurgitation in patients surviving endocarditis and the subsequent risk of heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Clinical usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for identification of abnormal extra-cardiac foci in patients with infective endocarditis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Diastolic function recommendations: Are we too relaxed when reporting myocardial relaxation?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: Patients with left axis deviation (LAD) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) show less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to other LBBB-patients. This study investigates the reasons for this.

METHODS: Sixty-eight patients eligible for CRT were included. Patients were divided into groups according to QRS-axis; normal axis (NA), left axis deviation (LAD) and right axis deviation (RAD). Before CRT implantation CMR imaging was performed to evaluate scar tissue. Echocardiography was performed before and after implantation. The electrical substrate was assessed by measuring interlead electrical delays. Response was evaluated after 8 months by left ventricular (LV) remodelling and clinical response.

RESULTS: Forty-four (65%) patients were responders in terms of LV remodelling. The presence of LAD was found to be independently associated with a poor LV remodelling non-response OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06-0.77] (p = 0.02). Patients with axis deviation had more myocardial scar tissue (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 0.9 ± 0.6, P = 0.04), more severe LV hypertrophy (14 (64%) and 6 (60%) vs. 7 (29%), P = 0.05) and tended to have a shorter interlead electrical delay than patients with NA (79 ± 40 ms vs. 92 ± 48 ms, P = 0.07). A high scar tissue burden was more pronounced in non-responders (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: LAD in the presence of LBBB is a predictor of poor outcome after CRT. Patients with LBBB and LAD have more scar tissue, hypertrophy and less activation delay.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Electrocardiology
ISSN0022-0736
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 59170001