TY - JOUR
T1 - Laser Doppler flowmetry is valid for measurement of cerebral blood flow autoregulation lower limit in rats
AU - Tonnesen, Jan
AU - Pryds, Anders
AU - Larsen, Erik H
AU - Paulson, Olaf B
AU - Hauerberg, John
AU - Knudsen, Gitte M
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a recent technique that is increasingly being used to monitor relative changes in cerebral blood flow whereas the intra-arterial 133xenon injection technique is a well-established method for repeated absolute measurements of cerebral blood flow. The aim of this study was to validate LDF for assessment of cerebral autoregulation and CO2 reactivity with the 133xenon injection technique as the gold standard. Simultaneous measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) were collected by LDF (CBF(LDF)) and the 133xenon method (CBF(Xe)) while (1) cerebral autoregulation was challenged by controlled systemic haemorrhage, or (2) cerebral blood flow was varied by manipulating the arterial partial pressure of CO2 (P(a,CO2)). LDF slightly overestimated CBF under conditions of haemorrhagic shock and haemodilution caused by controlled haemorrhage (paired t test, P < 0.05). However for pooled data, the autoregulation lower limit was similar when determined with the 133xenon and the LDF techniques: 65 +/- 3.9 mmHg and 60 +/- 5.6 mmHg, respectively. Linear regression analysis yielded CBF(Xe) = (1.02 x CBF(LDF)) + 9.1 and r = 0.90. Even for substantial changes in P(a,CO2), the two methods resulted in similar results. We conclude that even though LDF overestimated CBF during haemorrhagic shock caused by controlled haemorrhage, the lower limit autoregulation was correctly identified. The laser Doppler technique provides a reliable method for detection of a wide range of cerebral blood flow changes under CO2 challenge. Haemodilution influences the two methods differently causing relative overestimation of blood flow by the laser Doppler technique compared to the 1(33)xenon method.
AB - Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a recent technique that is increasingly being used to monitor relative changes in cerebral blood flow whereas the intra-arterial 133xenon injection technique is a well-established method for repeated absolute measurements of cerebral blood flow. The aim of this study was to validate LDF for assessment of cerebral autoregulation and CO2 reactivity with the 133xenon injection technique as the gold standard. Simultaneous measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) were collected by LDF (CBF(LDF)) and the 133xenon method (CBF(Xe)) while (1) cerebral autoregulation was challenged by controlled systemic haemorrhage, or (2) cerebral blood flow was varied by manipulating the arterial partial pressure of CO2 (P(a,CO2)). LDF slightly overestimated CBF under conditions of haemorrhagic shock and haemodilution caused by controlled haemorrhage (paired t test, P < 0.05). However for pooled data, the autoregulation lower limit was similar when determined with the 133xenon and the LDF techniques: 65 +/- 3.9 mmHg and 60 +/- 5.6 mmHg, respectively. Linear regression analysis yielded CBF(Xe) = (1.02 x CBF(LDF)) + 9.1 and r = 0.90. Even for substantial changes in P(a,CO2), the two methods resulted in similar results. We conclude that even though LDF overestimated CBF during haemorrhagic shock caused by controlled haemorrhage, the lower limit autoregulation was correctly identified. The laser Doppler technique provides a reliable method for detection of a wide range of cerebral blood flow changes under CO2 challenge. Haemodilution influences the two methods differently causing relative overestimation of blood flow by the laser Doppler technique compared to the 1(33)xenon method.
KW - Animals
KW - Blood Flow Velocity/physiology
KW - Brain/blood supply
KW - Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology
KW - Hemostasis/physiology
KW - Laser-Doppler Flowmetry/methods
KW - Male
KW - Rats
KW - Rats, Sprague-Dawley
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
U2 - 10.1113/expphysiol.2004.029512
DO - 10.1113/expphysiol.2004.029512
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 15653714
SN - 0958-0670
VL - 90
SP - 349
EP - 355
JO - Experimental Physiology
JF - Experimental Physiology
IS - 3
ER -