Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-assisted Suturing Performance Among Novice Surgeons: A Blinded, Cross-Over Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Evaluation of Sexual and Urinary Function After Implementation of Robot-assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Limited Evidence for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Outcomes From an Enhanced Recovery Program for Laparoscopic Gastric Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Surgical Residents are Excluded From Robot-assisted Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Validation of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) database - on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Outcome following local excision of T1 anal cancers-a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  3. Anastomotic technique is not associated with leakage rate after right hemicolectomy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) presents several advantages over 3-dimensional conventional laparoscopy (3D-CL) that may facilitate laparoscopic suturing especially with novice surgeons. This study compares novice surgeons' suturing performance by 3D-CL and RAL using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), an objective, validated scoring tool. Twenty-two surgeons with no robotic experience completed a standardized suturing task in an experimental setup by both 3D-CL and RAL in a randomized, cross-over design. Two experienced surgeons blindly assessed their performance using OSATS. Median (interquartile range) OSATS scores for 3D-CL and RAL were, respectively, 22.8 (17.4 to 25.8) versus 25.0 (21.9 to 26.5), P=0.032. There was no association between laparoscopic experience and robotic-assisted suturing performance. Thus, this study is, to our knowledge, the first to compare novice surgeons' suturing performance by 3D-CL and RAL using an objective, validated scoring tool and to show better suturing performance when assisted by the robot regardless of experience level.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSurgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
Vol/bind30
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)117-122
Antal sider6
ISSN1530-4515
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2020

ID: 61736255