Abstract
Brucella species are a frequent cause of laboratory-acquired infections. This report describes the handling of a laboratory exposure of 17 laboratory staff members exposed to Brucella melitensis in a large microbiology laboratory in a brucella-non-endemic area. We followed the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, but, of 14 staff members classified as high-risk exposure, none accepted post-exposure prophylaxis. However, in a period of 6 months of follow-up, none of the exposed laboratory workers developed brucellosis and all obtained sera were negative for antibrucella antibodies. We therefore question the value of routine serological follow-up.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | The Journal of hospital infection |
| Vol/bind | 85 |
| Udgave nummer | 3 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 237-9 |
| Antal sider | 3 |
| ISSN | 0195-6701 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - nov. 2013 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Laboratory exposure to Brucella melitensis in Denmark: a prospective study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS