Kritisk læsning af artikler om randomiserede kliniske forsøg

Anders Granholm; Morten Hylander Møller; Christian Gluud; Andreas Lundh; Asbjørn Hróbartsson; Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell; Anders Perner

Kritisk læsning af artikler om randomiserede kliniske forsøg

Anders Granholm^*, Morten Hylander Møller, Christian Gluud, Andreas Lundh, Asbjørn Hróbartsson, Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, Anders Perner

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Abstract

The randomised clinical trial is the most reliable study design to compare the effects of different interventions, however, the methodological quality of randomised clinical trials varies. In this review, the central considerations for critically appraising a randomised clinical trial are described along with an example, terminological references, description of design variants and reporting guidelines and appraisal tools. This review aims at helping clinicians and other users of randomised clinical trials to assess the trustworthiness and relevance of trial results for their own practice.

Bidragets oversatte titel	Critical reading of articles on randomised clinical trials
Originalsprog	Dansk
Artikelnummer	V06230427
Tidsskrift	Ugeskrift for Laeger
Vol/bind	185
Udgave nummer	45
ISSN	0041-5782
Status	Udgivet - 6 nov. 2023

Emneord

Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design

Adgang til dokumentet

https://ugeskriftet.dk/videnskab/kritisk-laesning-af-artikler-om-randomiserede-kliniske-forsogLicens: CC BY-NC

Citationsformater

@article{c67fa13be235454ea717a2dca5aeac30,

title = "Kritisk l{\ae}sning af artikler om randomiserede kliniske fors{\o}g",

abstract = "The randomised clinical trial is the most reliable study design to compare the effects of different interventions, however, the methodological quality of randomised clinical trials varies. In this review, the central considerations for critically appraising a randomised clinical trial are described along with an example, terminological references, description of design variants and reporting guidelines and appraisal tools. This review aims at helping clinicians and other users of randomised clinical trials to assess the trustworthiness and relevance of trial results for their own practice.",

keywords = "Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design",

author = "Anders Granholm and M{\o}ller, {Morten Hylander} and Christian Gluud and Andreas Lundh and Asbj{\o}rn Hr{\'o}bartsson and {de Muckadell}, {Ove B Schaffalitzky} and Anders Perner",

note = "Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.",

year = "2023",

month = nov,

day = "6",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "185",

journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",

issn = "0041-5782",

publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",

number = "45",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kritisk læsning af artikler om randomiserede kliniske forsøg

AU - Granholm, Anders

AU - Møller, Morten Hylander

AU - Gluud, Christian

AU - Lundh, Andreas

AU - Hróbartsson, Asbjørn

AU - de Muckadell, Ove B Schaffalitzky

AU - Perner, Anders

N1 - Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

PY - 2023/11/6

Y1 - 2023/11/6

N2 - The randomised clinical trial is the most reliable study design to compare the effects of different interventions, however, the methodological quality of randomised clinical trials varies. In this review, the central considerations for critically appraising a randomised clinical trial are described along with an example, terminological references, description of design variants and reporting guidelines and appraisal tools. This review aims at helping clinicians and other users of randomised clinical trials to assess the trustworthiness and relevance of trial results for their own practice.

AB - The randomised clinical trial is the most reliable study design to compare the effects of different interventions, however, the methodological quality of randomised clinical trials varies. In this review, the central considerations for critically appraising a randomised clinical trial are described along with an example, terminological references, description of design variants and reporting guidelines and appraisal tools. This review aims at helping clinicians and other users of randomised clinical trials to assess the trustworthiness and relevance of trial results for their own practice.

KW - Humans

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Research Design

M3 - Review

C2 - 37987450

SN - 0041-5782

VL - 185

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

IS - 45

M1 - V06230427

ER -

Kritisk læsning af artikler om randomiserede kliniske forsøg

Abstract

Emneord

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater