TY - JOUR
T1 - Juleartikel:
T2 - Velbefindende i varmt vejr – et randomiseret overkrydsningsforsøg
AU - Moseholm, Viktor Bay
AU - Reistrup, Hugin
AU - Rosenberg, Jacob
AU - Fonnes, Siv
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
PY - 2023/12/11
Y1 - 2023/12/11
N2 - Introduction While some studies have investigated the cooling properties of warm beverages, no studies have examined thermal well-being in warm environments in relation to beverage temperature. Methods Thirty researchers were randomised in a 1:1 ratio in a double-blinded cross-over study. Participants were randomised to drink 10cl of 10°C and 50°C decaffeinated tea, 15 minutes apart while staying outside in the Turkish summer heat at noon. Well-being was assessed using the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) thermal sensation scale, Bedford thermal comfort scale, Brief Mood Introspection Scale (BMIS), and the last two domains of EuroQol 5-domain, 5-point scale: EQ-5D-5L. Results Neither clinically nor statistically significant differences were found in well-being between warm and cold tea. Moods soured significantly as the trial course passed (using BMIS, µ 1.9; P=0.03), but comfort in the heat bettered (using Bedford, µ -0.37; P less-than 0.001). These changes were not considered to be clinically significant. Conclusion We were unable to show any correlation between beverage temperature and comfort in a hot environment. The mood of participants did, however, deteriorate as time passed-a lesson to any future researchers conducting drawn-out experiments just before lunch. Funding none. Trial registration NCT05900960.
AB - Introduction While some studies have investigated the cooling properties of warm beverages, no studies have examined thermal well-being in warm environments in relation to beverage temperature. Methods Thirty researchers were randomised in a 1:1 ratio in a double-blinded cross-over study. Participants were randomised to drink 10cl of 10°C and 50°C decaffeinated tea, 15 minutes apart while staying outside in the Turkish summer heat at noon. Well-being was assessed using the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) thermal sensation scale, Bedford thermal comfort scale, Brief Mood Introspection Scale (BMIS), and the last two domains of EuroQol 5-domain, 5-point scale: EQ-5D-5L. Results Neither clinically nor statistically significant differences were found in well-being between warm and cold tea. Moods soured significantly as the trial course passed (using BMIS, µ 1.9; P=0.03), but comfort in the heat bettered (using Bedford, µ -0.37; P less-than 0.001). These changes were not considered to be clinically significant. Conclusion We were unable to show any correlation between beverage temperature and comfort in a hot environment. The mood of participants did, however, deteriorate as time passed-a lesson to any future researchers conducting drawn-out experiments just before lunch. Funding none. Trial registration NCT05900960.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179641626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
C2 - 38084617
AN - SCOPUS:85179641626
SN - 0041-5782
VL - 185
JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger
JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger
IS - 50
M1 - V20239
ER -