Is treat-to-target really working in rheumatoid arthritis? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients treated in daily practice (RA BIODAM)

Sofia Ramiro, Robert Bm Landewé, Désirée van der Heijde, Alexandre Sepriano, Oliver FitzGerald, Mikkel Ostergaard, Joanne Homik, Ori Elkayam, J Carter Thorne, Margaret Larche, Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Marina Backhaus, Gilles Boire, Bernard Combe, Thierry Schaeverbeke, Alain Saraux, Maxime Dougados, Maurizio Rossini, Marcello Govoni, Luigi SinigagliaAlain G Cantagrel, Cornelia F Allaart, Cheryl Barnabe, Clifton O Bingham, Paul P Tak, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg, Hilde Berner Hammer, Rana Dadashova, Edna Hutchings, Joel Paschke

52 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice leads to more patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) meeting the remission target.

METHODS: RA patients from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA BIODAM (BIOmarkers of joint DAMage) cohort). Per visit was decided whether a patient was treated according to a T2T-strategy with 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) remission (DAS44 <1.6) as the target. Sustained T2T was defined as T2T followed in ≥2 consecutive visits. The main outcome was the achievement of DAS44 remission at the subsequent 3-month visit. Other outcomes were remission according to 28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean definitions. The association between T2T and remission was tested in generalised estimating equations models.

RESULTS: In total 4356 visits of 571 patients (mean (SD) age: 56 (13) years, 78% female) were included. Appropriate application of T2T was found in 59% of the visits. T2T (vs no T2T) did not yield a higher likelihood of DAS44 remission 3 months later (OR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.92 to 1.16)), but sustained T2T resulted in an increased likelihood of achieving DAS44 remission (OR: 1.19 (1.03 to 1.39)). Similar results were seen with DAS28-ESR remission. For more stringent definitions (CDAI, SDAI and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission), T2T was consistently positively associated with remission (OR range: 1.16 to 1.29), and sustained T2T had a more pronounced effect on remission (OR range: 1.49 to 1.52).

CONCLUSION: In daily clinical practice, the correct application of a T2T-strategy (especially sustained T2T) in patients with RA leads to higher rates of remission.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Vol/bind79
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)453-459
Antal sider7
ISSN0003-4967
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2020

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Is treat-to-target really working in rheumatoid arthritis? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients treated in daily practice (RA BIODAM)'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater