Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Is parotid saliva sterile on entry to the oral cavity?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Submandibular ectopic thyroid tissue and concurrent thyroid hemiagenesis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Clinicopathologic characteristics of Burkitt lymphoma of the head and neck in a non-endemic region-a Danish nationwide study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Update 2016-2018 of the Nationwide Danish Fungaemia Surveillance Study: Epidemiologic Changes in a 15-Year Perspective

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Omics-based tracking of Pseudomonas aeruginosa persistence in "eradicated" cystic fibrosis patients.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Bacterial persisters in long-term infection: Emergence and fitness in a complex host environment

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Gene Loss and Acquisition in Lineages of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Evolving in Cystic Fibrosis Patient Airways

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that parotid saliva is sterile on entry to the oral cavity.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate if parotid saliva is sterile on entry to the oral cavity and, thus, prior to contamination by oral bacteria.

METHOD: Forty healthy volunteers were included in sterile parotid saliva collection. Parotid saliva was collected using a sterile Lashley cup, placed over the papilla of the Stensen´s duct, as well as sterile tubes and syringes for collection. All collections were followed by collection of a positive control sample where some of the sterile obtained parotid saliva had been exposed to the contralateral mucosal membranes. All samples parotid saliva, as well as the positive controls, were cultivated, and 10 randomly selected parotid saliva samples underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses.

RESULTS: In 33 of 40 parotid saliva samples there were no cultivable bacteria, whereas bacteria were cultivated in all positive control samples. In eight of 10 PCR samples no bacterial DNA was detected. The most frequent bacteria in the remaining non-sterile parotid saliva samples and positive control samples were non-haemolytical streptococci and the coagulase negative staphylococci.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Oto-Laryngologica
Vol/bind137
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)762-4
ISSN0001-6489
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

ID: 49757196