Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Investigating the response scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in German cancer patients and a population survey

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Measuring the well-being of people with dementia: a conceptual scoping review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Health-related qualify of life, angina type and coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Size and composition of family networks of decedents: A nationwide register-based study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • EORTC Quality of Life Group
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The European Organization for research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) scales are scored on a 4-point response scale, ranging from not at all to very much. Previous studies have shown that the German translation of the response option quite a bit as mäßig violates interval scale assumptions, and that ziemlich is a more appropriate translation. The present studies investigated differences between the two questionnaire versions.

METHODS: The first study employed a balanced cross-over design and included 450 patients with different types of cancer from three German-speaking countries. The second study was a representative survey in Germany including 2033 respondents. The main analyses included compared the ziemlich and mäßig version of the questionnaire using analyses of covariance adjusted for sex, age, and health burden.

RESULTS: In accordance with our hypothesis, the adjusted summary score was lower in the mäßig than in the ziemlich version; Study 1: - 4.5 (95% CI - 7.8 to - 1.3), p = 0.006, Study 2: - 3.1 (95% CI - 4.6 to - 1.5), p < 0.001. In both studies, this effect was pronounced in respondents with a higher health burden; Study 1: - 6.8 (95% CI - 12.2 to - 1.4), p = 0.013; Study 2: - 4.5 (95% CI - 7.3 to - 1.7), p = 0.002.

CONCLUSIONS: We found subtle but consistent differences between the two questionnaire versions. We recommend to use the optimized response option for the EORTC QLQ-C30 as well as for all other German modules.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on the German Registry for Clinical Studies (reference number DRKS00012759, 04th August 2017, https://www.drks.de/DRKS00012759 ).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer235
TidsskriftHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Vol/bind19
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)235
Antal sider14
ISSN1477-7525
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 okt. 2021

Bibliografisk note

© 2021. The Author(s).

ID: 69264936