TY - JOUR
T1 - Invasive Ventilatory Support in Patients With Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
T2 - From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference
AU - Fernández, Analía
AU - Modesto, Vicent
AU - Rimensberger, Peter C
AU - Korang, Steven K
AU - Iyer, Narayan P
AU - Cheifetz, Ira M
AU - Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network
N1 - Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence for the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference updated recommendations and consensus statements for clinical practice and future research on invasive mechanical ventilation support of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS).DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).STUDY SELECTION: We included clinical studies of critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for PARDS, January 2013 to April 2022. In addition, meta-analyses and systematic reviews focused on the adult acute respiratory distress syndrome population were included to explore new relevant concepts (e.g., mechanical power, driving pressure, etc.) still underrepresented in the contemporary pediatric literature.DATA EXTRACTION: Title/abstract review, full text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.DATA SYNTHESIS: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize relevant evidence and develop recommendations, good practice statements and research statements. We identified 26 pediatric studies for inclusion and 36 meta-analyses or systematic reviews in adults. We generated 12 recommendations, two research statements, and five good practice statements related to modes of ventilation, tidal volume, ventilation pressures, lung-protective ventilation bundles, driving pressure, mechanical power, recruitment maneuvers, prone positioning, and high-frequency ventilation. Only one recommendation, related to use of positive end-expiratory pressure, is classified as strong, with moderate certainty of evidence.CONCLUSIONS: Limited pediatric data exist to make definitive recommendations for the management of invasive mechanical ventilation for patients with PARDS. Ongoing research is needed to better understand how to guide best practices and improve outcomes for patients with PARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence for the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference updated recommendations and consensus statements for clinical practice and future research on invasive mechanical ventilation support of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS).DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost).STUDY SELECTION: We included clinical studies of critically ill patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for PARDS, January 2013 to April 2022. In addition, meta-analyses and systematic reviews focused on the adult acute respiratory distress syndrome population were included to explore new relevant concepts (e.g., mechanical power, driving pressure, etc.) still underrepresented in the contemporary pediatric literature.DATA EXTRACTION: Title/abstract review, full text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form.DATA SYNTHESIS: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize relevant evidence and develop recommendations, good practice statements and research statements. We identified 26 pediatric studies for inclusion and 36 meta-analyses or systematic reviews in adults. We generated 12 recommendations, two research statements, and five good practice statements related to modes of ventilation, tidal volume, ventilation pressures, lung-protective ventilation bundles, driving pressure, mechanical power, recruitment maneuvers, prone positioning, and high-frequency ventilation. Only one recommendation, related to use of positive end-expiratory pressure, is classified as strong, with moderate certainty of evidence.CONCLUSIONS: Limited pediatric data exist to make definitive recommendations for the management of invasive mechanical ventilation for patients with PARDS. Ongoing research is needed to better understand how to guide best practices and improve outcomes for patients with PARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
KW - Acute Lung Injury
KW - Adult
KW - Child
KW - Humans
KW - Positive-Pressure Respiration
KW - Respiration, Artificial
KW - Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy
KW - Tidal Volume
KW - hypoxemia
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - ventilator induced lung injury
KW - oxygenation
KW - gas exchange
KW - pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146916785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003159
DO - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003159
M3 - Review
C2 - 36661436
SN - 1529-7535
VL - 24
SP - S61-S75
JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
IS - 12 Suppl 2
ER -