TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravenous mecillinam compared with other β-lactams as targeted treatment for Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. bacteraemia with urinary tract focus
AU - Boel, Jonas Bredtoft
AU - Antsupova, Valeria
AU - Knudsen, Jenny Dahl
AU - Jarløv, Jens Otto
AU - Arpi, Magnus
AU - Holzknecht, Barbara Juliane
N1 - © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Background: Mecillinam (amdinocillin) is active against Gram-negative bacteria. Clinical data on the efficacy of IV mecillinam for severe urinary tract infections is sparse. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of targeted IV mecillinam compared with other b-lactams for bacteraemia with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. and a urinary tract focus. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at five university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to compare the primary composite endpoint (all-cause mortality or bacteraemia recurrence within 30 days) between patients treated with mecillinam versus ampicillin, cefuroxime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem. Results: We included 1129 patients in the primary analysis, of which 146 were given IV mecillinam as targeted treatment. We found no significant difference in the primary endpoint between patients treated with mecillinam versus ampicillin and cefuroxime, but found a higher risk for the primary endpoint in the piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem groups, with adjusted HRs of 2.22 (95% CI 1.24-3.97, P < 0.01) and 2.48 (95% CI 1.04-5.93, P = 0.04), respectively, compared with mecillinam. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that IV mecillinam may be a suitable targeted treatment for bacteraemia with a urinary tract focus. However, these results need confirmation by randomized controlled studies.
AB - Background: Mecillinam (amdinocillin) is active against Gram-negative bacteria. Clinical data on the efficacy of IV mecillinam for severe urinary tract infections is sparse. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of targeted IV mecillinam compared with other b-lactams for bacteraemia with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. and a urinary tract focus. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at five university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to compare the primary composite endpoint (all-cause mortality or bacteraemia recurrence within 30 days) between patients treated with mecillinam versus ampicillin, cefuroxime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem. Results: We included 1129 patients in the primary analysis, of which 146 were given IV mecillinam as targeted treatment. We found no significant difference in the primary endpoint between patients treated with mecillinam versus ampicillin and cefuroxime, but found a higher risk for the primary endpoint in the piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem groups, with adjusted HRs of 2.22 (95% CI 1.24-3.97, P < 0.01) and 2.48 (95% CI 1.04-5.93, P = 0.04), respectively, compared with mecillinam. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that IV mecillinam may be a suitable targeted treatment for bacteraemia with a urinary tract focus. However, these results need confirmation by randomized controlled studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098459769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jac/dkaa411
DO - 10.1093/jac/dkaa411
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32989447
SN - 0305-7453
VL - 76
SP - 206
EP - 211
JO - The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
JF - The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
IS - 1
M1 - dkaa411
ER -