Harvard
Overgaard, JA, Larsen, CM, Holtze, S, Ockholm, K
& Kristensen, MT 2017, '
Interrater Reliability of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Women With Hip Fracture',
Journal of geriatric physical therapy, bind 40, nr. 3, s. 158-166.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000088
APA
Overgaard, J. A., Larsen, C. M., Holtze, S., Ockholm, K.
, & Kristensen, M. T. (2017).
Interrater Reliability of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Women With Hip Fracture.
Journal of geriatric physical therapy,
40(3), 158-166.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000088
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
@article{ca6bf5ba0bd24aed8d81c38f7ccfe111,
title = "Interrater Reliability of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Women With Hip Fracture",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a clinical outcome measure. However, the reliability of the 6MWT is unknown in individuals who have recently experienced a hip fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative and absolute interrater reliability of the 6MWT in individuals with hip fracture.METHODS: Two senior physical therapy students independently examined a convenience sample of 20 participants in a randomized order. Their assessments were separated by 2 days and followed the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society. Hip fracture-related pain was assessed with the Verbal Ranking Scale.RESULTS: Participants (all women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 78.1 (5.9) years performed the test at a mean of 31.5 (5.8) days postsurgery. Of the participants, 10 had a cervical fracture and 10 had a trochanteric fracture. Excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2.1] = 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97) was found, and the standard error of measurement and smallest real difference were calculated to be 21.4 and 59.4 m, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant difference (mean of 3.2 [31.5] m, P = .83) between the 2 raters, and no heteroscedasticity was observed (r = -0.196, P = .41). By contrast, participants walked an average of 21.7 (22.5) m longer during the second trial (P = .002). Participants with moderate hip fracture-related pain walked a shorter distance than those with no or light pain during the first test (P = .04), but this was not the case during the second test (P = .25).CONCLUSION: The interrater reliability of the 6MWT is excellent, and changes of more than 21.4 m (group level) and 59.4 m (individual participants with hip fracture) indicate a real change in the 6MWT. Measuring hip fracture-related pain during testing is recommended for individuals with hip fracture who undergo the 6MWT.",
author = "Overgaard, {Jan Arnholtz} and Larsen, {Camilla Marie} and Steffen Holtze and Kenneth Ockholm and Kristensen, {Morten Tange}",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1519/JPT.0000000000000088",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "158--166",
journal = "Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy",
issn = "1539-8412",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "3",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Interrater Reliability of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Women With Hip Fracture
AU - Overgaard, Jan Arnholtz
AU - Larsen, Camilla Marie
AU - Holtze, Steffen
AU - Ockholm, Kenneth
AU - Kristensen, Morten Tange
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a clinical outcome measure. However, the reliability of the 6MWT is unknown in individuals who have recently experienced a hip fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative and absolute interrater reliability of the 6MWT in individuals with hip fracture.METHODS: Two senior physical therapy students independently examined a convenience sample of 20 participants in a randomized order. Their assessments were separated by 2 days and followed the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society. Hip fracture-related pain was assessed with the Verbal Ranking Scale.RESULTS: Participants (all women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 78.1 (5.9) years performed the test at a mean of 31.5 (5.8) days postsurgery. Of the participants, 10 had a cervical fracture and 10 had a trochanteric fracture. Excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2.1] = 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97) was found, and the standard error of measurement and smallest real difference were calculated to be 21.4 and 59.4 m, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant difference (mean of 3.2 [31.5] m, P = .83) between the 2 raters, and no heteroscedasticity was observed (r = -0.196, P = .41). By contrast, participants walked an average of 21.7 (22.5) m longer during the second trial (P = .002). Participants with moderate hip fracture-related pain walked a shorter distance than those with no or light pain during the first test (P = .04), but this was not the case during the second test (P = .25).CONCLUSION: The interrater reliability of the 6MWT is excellent, and changes of more than 21.4 m (group level) and 59.4 m (individual participants with hip fracture) indicate a real change in the 6MWT. Measuring hip fracture-related pain during testing is recommended for individuals with hip fracture who undergo the 6MWT.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a clinical outcome measure. However, the reliability of the 6MWT is unknown in individuals who have recently experienced a hip fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative and absolute interrater reliability of the 6MWT in individuals with hip fracture.METHODS: Two senior physical therapy students independently examined a convenience sample of 20 participants in a randomized order. Their assessments were separated by 2 days and followed the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society. Hip fracture-related pain was assessed with the Verbal Ranking Scale.RESULTS: Participants (all women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 78.1 (5.9) years performed the test at a mean of 31.5 (5.8) days postsurgery. Of the participants, 10 had a cervical fracture and 10 had a trochanteric fracture. Excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2.1] = 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97) was found, and the standard error of measurement and smallest real difference were calculated to be 21.4 and 59.4 m, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant difference (mean of 3.2 [31.5] m, P = .83) between the 2 raters, and no heteroscedasticity was observed (r = -0.196, P = .41). By contrast, participants walked an average of 21.7 (22.5) m longer during the second trial (P = .002). Participants with moderate hip fracture-related pain walked a shorter distance than those with no or light pain during the first test (P = .04), but this was not the case during the second test (P = .25).CONCLUSION: The interrater reliability of the 6MWT is excellent, and changes of more than 21.4 m (group level) and 59.4 m (individual participants with hip fracture) indicate a real change in the 6MWT. Measuring hip fracture-related pain during testing is recommended for individuals with hip fracture who undergo the 6MWT.
U2 - 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000088
DO - 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000088
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27213999
VL - 40
SP - 158
EP - 166
JO - Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
JF - Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
SN - 1539-8412
IS - 3
ER -