Harvard
Jensen, SS, Aaboe, M, Janner, SFM, Saulacic, N, Bornstein, MM, Bosshardt, DD & Buser, D 2015, '
Influence of particle size of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on new bone formation and implant stability after simultaneous sinus floor elevation: a histomorphometric study in minipigs'
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, bind 17, nr. 2, s. 274-85.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12101
APA
Jensen, S. S., Aaboe, M., Janner, S. F. M., Saulacic, N., Bornstein, M. M., Bosshardt, D. D., & Buser, D. (2015).
Influence of particle size of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on new bone formation and implant stability after simultaneous sinus floor elevation: a histomorphometric study in minipigs.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research,
17(2), 274-85.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12101
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
@article{d454bc088d69451a8a1dad1c88119766,
title = "Influence of particle size of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on new bone formation and implant stability after simultaneous sinus floor elevation: a histomorphometric study in minipigs",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is one of the best-documented bone substitute materials for sinus floor elevation (SFE).PURPOSE: DBBM is available in two particle sizes. Large particles are believed to facilitate improved neoangiogenesis compared with small ones. However, their impact on the rate of new bone formation, osteoconduction, and DBBM degradation has never been reported. In addition, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) has never been correlated to bone-to-implant contact (BIC) after SFE with simultaneous implant placement.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral SFE with simultaneous implant placement was performed in 10 G{\"o}ttingen minipigs. The two sides were randomized to receive large or small particle size DBBM. Two groups of 5 minipigs healed for 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. ISQ was recorded immediately after implant placement and at sacrifice. Qualitative histological differences were described and bone formation, DBBM degradation, BIC and bone-to-DBBM contact (osteoconduction) were quantified histomorphometrically.RESULTS: DBBM particle size had no qualitative or quantitative impact on the amount of newly formed bone, DBBM degradation, or BIC for either of the healing periods (p > 0.05). Small-size DBBM showed higher osteoconduction after 6 weeks than large-size DBBM (p < 0.001). After 12 weeks this difference was compensated. There was no significant correlation between BIC and ISQ.CONCLUSION: Small and large particle sizes were equally predictable when DBBM was used for SFE with simultaneous implant placement.",
author = "Jensen, {Simon S} and Merete Aaboe and Janner, {Simone F M} and Nikola Saulacic and Bornstein, {Michael M} and Bosshardt, {Dieter D} and Daniel Buser",
note = "{\circledC} 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/cid.12101",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "274--85",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Dental Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of particle size of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on new bone formation and implant stability after simultaneous sinus floor elevation
T2 - a histomorphometric study in minipigs
AU - Jensen, Simon S
AU - Aaboe, Merete
AU - Janner, Simone F M
AU - Saulacic, Nikola
AU - Bornstein, Michael M
AU - Bosshardt, Dieter D
AU - Buser, Daniel
N1 - © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2015/4
Y1 - 2015/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is one of the best-documented bone substitute materials for sinus floor elevation (SFE).PURPOSE: DBBM is available in two particle sizes. Large particles are believed to facilitate improved neoangiogenesis compared with small ones. However, their impact on the rate of new bone formation, osteoconduction, and DBBM degradation has never been reported. In addition, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) has never been correlated to bone-to-implant contact (BIC) after SFE with simultaneous implant placement.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral SFE with simultaneous implant placement was performed in 10 Göttingen minipigs. The two sides were randomized to receive large or small particle size DBBM. Two groups of 5 minipigs healed for 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. ISQ was recorded immediately after implant placement and at sacrifice. Qualitative histological differences were described and bone formation, DBBM degradation, BIC and bone-to-DBBM contact (osteoconduction) were quantified histomorphometrically.RESULTS: DBBM particle size had no qualitative or quantitative impact on the amount of newly formed bone, DBBM degradation, or BIC for either of the healing periods (p > 0.05). Small-size DBBM showed higher osteoconduction after 6 weeks than large-size DBBM (p < 0.001). After 12 weeks this difference was compensated. There was no significant correlation between BIC and ISQ.CONCLUSION: Small and large particle sizes were equally predictable when DBBM was used for SFE with simultaneous implant placement.
AB - BACKGROUND: Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is one of the best-documented bone substitute materials for sinus floor elevation (SFE).PURPOSE: DBBM is available in two particle sizes. Large particles are believed to facilitate improved neoangiogenesis compared with small ones. However, their impact on the rate of new bone formation, osteoconduction, and DBBM degradation has never been reported. In addition, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) has never been correlated to bone-to-implant contact (BIC) after SFE with simultaneous implant placement.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bilateral SFE with simultaneous implant placement was performed in 10 Göttingen minipigs. The two sides were randomized to receive large or small particle size DBBM. Two groups of 5 minipigs healed for 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. ISQ was recorded immediately after implant placement and at sacrifice. Qualitative histological differences were described and bone formation, DBBM degradation, BIC and bone-to-DBBM contact (osteoconduction) were quantified histomorphometrically.RESULTS: DBBM particle size had no qualitative or quantitative impact on the amount of newly formed bone, DBBM degradation, or BIC for either of the healing periods (p > 0.05). Small-size DBBM showed higher osteoconduction after 6 weeks than large-size DBBM (p < 0.001). After 12 weeks this difference was compensated. There was no significant correlation between BIC and ISQ.CONCLUSION: Small and large particle sizes were equally predictable when DBBM was used for SFE with simultaneous implant placement.
U2 - 10.1111/cid.12101
DO - 10.1111/cid.12101
M3 - Journal article
VL - 17
SP - 274
EP - 285
JO - Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
JF - Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
SN - 1523-0899
IS - 2
ER -