TY - JOUR
T1 - In vivo evaluation of synthetic aperture sequential beamforming
AU - Hemmsen, Martin Christian
AU - Møller Hansen, Peter
AU - Lange, Theis
AU - Hansen, Jens Munk
AU - Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
AU - Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
N1 - Copyright © 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Ultrasound in vivo imaging using synthetic aperture sequential beamformation (SASB) is compared with conventional imaging in a double blinded study using side-by-side comparisons. The objective is to evaluate if the image quality in terms of penetration depth, spatial resolution, contrast and unwanted artifacts is comparable to conventional imaging. In vivo data was acquired using a ProFocus ultrasound scanner (BK Medical, Herlev, Denmark) and a 192-element 3.5 MHz convex array transducer (Sound Technology Inc., PA, USA). Data were acquired interleaved, ensuring that the exact same anatomical locations were scanned. Eighteen volunteers were scanned abdominally resulting in 85 image sequence pairs. Evaluation of image quality was performed by five medical doctors. Results show that image quality using SASB was significantly better than conventional imaging (p value:
AB - Ultrasound in vivo imaging using synthetic aperture sequential beamformation (SASB) is compared with conventional imaging in a double blinded study using side-by-side comparisons. The objective is to evaluate if the image quality in terms of penetration depth, spatial resolution, contrast and unwanted artifacts is comparable to conventional imaging. In vivo data was acquired using a ProFocus ultrasound scanner (BK Medical, Herlev, Denmark) and a 192-element 3.5 MHz convex array transducer (Sound Technology Inc., PA, USA). Data were acquired interleaved, ensuring that the exact same anatomical locations were scanned. Eighteen volunteers were scanned abdominally resulting in 85 image sequence pairs. Evaluation of image quality was performed by five medical doctors. Results show that image quality using SASB was significantly better than conventional imaging (p value:
KW - Abdomen
KW - Adult
KW - Artifacts
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Image Enhancement
KW - Linear Models
KW - Male
KW - Statistics, Nonparametric
KW - Transducers
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84857768582
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.12.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.12.017
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 22390993
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 38
SP - 708
EP - 716
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
IS - 4
ER -