In vitro detection of circulating tumor cells compared by the CytoTrack and CellSearch methods

Thore Hillig, Peer Horn, Ann-Britt Nygaard Hillig, Anastasiya S. Haugaard, Sarah Nejlund, Ivan Brandslund, Georg Söletormos

43 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparison of two methods to detect circulating tumor cells (CTC) CytoTrack and CellSearch through recovery of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, spiked into blood collected from healthy donors. Spiking of a fixed number of EpCAM and pan-cytokeratin positive MCF-7 cells into 7.5 mL donor blood was performed by FACSAria flow sorting. The samples were shipped to either CytoTrack or CellSearch research facilities within 48 h, where evaluation of MCF-7 recovery was performed. CytoTrack and CellSearch analyses were performed simultaneously. Recoveries of MCF-7 single cells, cells in clusters, and clusters were determined. The average numbers of MCF-7 cells/cells in clusters/clusters recovered from blood by the CytoTrack and CellSearch methods were 103 ± 5.9/27 ± 7.9/11 ± 3.5 (95 % CI) and 107 ± 4.4/20 ± 7.1/10 ± 3.5, respectively, with no difference between the two methods (p = 0.37/p = 0.23/p = 0.09). Overall, the recovery of CytoTrack and CellSearch was 68.8 ± 3.9 %/71.1 ± 2.9 %, respectively (p = 0.58). In spite of different methodologies, CytoTrack and CellSearch found similar number of CTCs, when spiking was performed with the EpCAM and pan cytokeratin-positive cell line MCF-7. The results suggest that CytoTrack and CellSearch have similar abilities to identify CTC in vitro.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftTumor Biology
Vol/bind36
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)4597-4601
ISSN1010-4283
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 22 jan. 2015

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'In vitro detection of circulating tumor cells compared by the CytoTrack and CellSearch methods'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater