Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed

Miranda Langendam, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Nancy Santesso, Reem A Mustafa, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Matthew Ventresca, Pauline Heus, Toby Lasserson, Rasmus Moustgaard, Jan Brozek, Holger J Schünemann

    18 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group has developed GRADE evidence profiles (EP) and summary of findings (SoF) tables to present evidence summaries in systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and health technology assessments. Explanatory notes are used to explain choices and judgments in these summaries, for example, on rating of the quality of evidence.

    STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic survey of the explanations in SoF tables in 132 randomly selected Cochrane Intervention reviews and in EPs of 10 guidelines. We analyzed the content of 1,291 explanations using a predefined list of criteria.

    RESULTS: Most explanations were used to describe or communicate results and to explain downgrading of the quality of evidence, in particular for risk of bias and imprecision. Addressing the source of baseline risk (observational data or control group risk) was often missing. For judgments about downgrading the quality of evidence, the percentage of informative explanations ranged between 41% (imprecision) and 79% (indirectness).

    CONCLUSION: We found that by and large explanations were informative but detected several areas for improvement (e.g., source of baseline risk and judgments on imprecision). Guidance about explanatory footnotes and comments will be provided in the last article in this series.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
    Vol/bind74
    Sider (fra-til)19-27
    Antal sider9
    ISSN0895-4356
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - jun. 2016

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater