Abstract
Bias in diet reporting may be both random and non-random, and may be found with simpler as well as more advanced dietary instruments. A random bias will contribute to obscure relations between diet and disease. A systematic bias may obscure or aggravate such associations. Underreporting of non-protein energy has been found to be substantial, particularly among those who are obese or have high dietary intakes. Such a non-random bias on the group level would tend to aggravate associations between dietary non-protein and disease. Whether the net result of the random and non-random bias aggravates or obscures relations depends on the relative magnitude of the two.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
Vol/bind | 61 |
Udgave nummer | 7 |
Sider (fra-til) | 925-7 |
Antal sider | 3 |
ISSN | 0954-3007 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - jul. 2007 |