Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Implementing volunteer peer mentoring as a supplement to professional efforts in primary rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Pelvic organ prolapse and urogynecological assessment in women with spinal cord injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in women with spinal cord injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Jane Horsewell: 2 August 1952–8 August 2018

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatFormidling

  4. Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Fecal Incontinence and Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Women With Traumatic and Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Pelvic organ prolapse and urogynecological assessment in women with spinal cord injury

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Cross-sectional and prospective data-collection in North Macedonia-methodological considerations

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

STUDY DESIGN: A feasibility study, supplemented by a noncontrolled pretest/posttest.

OBJECTIVES: To examine if a nationwide volunteer peer-mentoring program for in-patients with acute/subacute spinal cord injury is feasible and achievable.

SETTING: The Spinal Cord Injury Center of Western Denmark and Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

METHODS: Volunteer mentor groups were formed similarly in two highly specialized SCI centers covering Denmark. Hospital staff was responsible for referral to the mentoring project and for the interdisciplinary evaluation of patient eligibility. At each of the two centers, a person living with the consequences of SCI coordinated the intervention in collaboration with healthcare personnel. Designated project personnel introduced eligible participants to the project. Staff at the SCI centers arranged to fit in the supplementary mentoring with ongoing treatment. A self-report questionnaire was completed prior to and after peer intervention.

OUTCOME: patient reports regarding mentoring sessions, change in quality of life (QoL), depression items from the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), pain frequency and intensity (11-point Numerical Rating Scale).

RESULTS: A nationwide mentor corps was established. Fifty-two eligible in-patients completed the study. Significant improvement in QoL was found after mentoring. Frequency and intensity of pain did not change, although five out of nine depression items improved significantly. A majority (94%) of the participants recommended others to meet with a peer mentor.

CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a nationwide volunteer mentor system at a highly specialized neuro-rehabilitation units for SCI in-patients is both feasible and acceptable.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSpinal Cord
Vol/bind57
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)881-889
Antal sider9
ISSN1362-4393
DOI
StatusUdgivet - okt. 2019

ID: 58403473