Implementation of MR colonography

M P Achiam, E Chabanova, V Løgager, H S Thomsen, J Rosenberg

11 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MR colonography (MRC) is a promising method of examining the colon, but is limited to a few specialist centres. The purpose of this article was to describe the implementation of MRC with fecal tagging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred for conventional colonoscopy (CC) were offered MRC with fecal tagging before CC. Two days before MRC patients ingested an oral contrast agent. Before and after MRC and CC a number of questions were addressed. MR images were rated by a blinded investigator.

RESULTS: In 6 months, 30 consecutive patients were included. The median time in the MR suite was 44 min, 23 min for the MRC examination and 9 min for the evaluation. The median time for CC was 32 min. Sixty-six percent of the patients preferred MRC as the future method of examination, 10% preferred CC, 21% had no preferences. Of the oral contrast agents, barium sulphate with ferumoxsil was significantly better than barium sulphate alone.

CONCLUSION: The majority of the patients found MRC less unpleasant than CC and a majority would prefer MRC over CC as a future colon examination. MRC also appears to be less time consuming to the patients and medical personnel than CC with post-procedural monitoring.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAbdominal Imaging
Vol/bind32
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)457-62
Antal sider6
ISSN0942-8925
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2007
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Implementation of MR colonography'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater