Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Implant treatment after traumatic tooth loss: A systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

DOI

  1. Bone Regeneration in Membrane-Protected Defects

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

  2. Fully versus conventionally guided implant placement by dental students: A randomized controlled trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Treatment after traumatic tooth loss is challenging and is currently guided by expert opinion and the individual patient situation. The aim of this study was to provide an overview on the outcome of dental implant treatment in the anterior maxilla after traumatic tooth loss, based on a systematic review of the existing evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed on PubMed, Cochran Library and Web of Science following the PRISMA guidelines based on a structured research question (PICO). All clinical studies of five patients or more with follow-up of at least 1 year after implant loading were included. Patients were at least 18 years of age. Cohen's Kappa-coefficient was calculated. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess the quality of the included studies. Descriptive statistical methods were applied.

RESULTS: Nine hundred and ninety-nine articles were identified through the systematic search. Finally, six articles were eligible for inclusion. The studies comprised prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series. From these, 96 patients with 120 implants were included. The age ranged from 18 to 59 years. The survival rates of implants and superstructures were 97% and 95%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Mean marginal bone resorption was 0.56 mm (range 0.21-1.30 mm). Complication rates were 7% and 11% on implant and superstructure level, respectively. Patient-reported outcome measures and objective evaluations showed a high level of satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome. Bone augmentation was performed in 60 implant sites. Three patients underwent pre-surgical orthodontic treatment. The maxillary central incisor was the most frequently replaced tooth (70%).

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review revealed a low level of evidence on the outcome of dental implant treatment after traumatic tooth loss. Systematic reporting of treatment outcomes of tooth replacements after dental trauma is highly encouraged to further guide dentists for the benefit of these challenging patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDental Traumatology Online
Vol/bind38
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)105-116
Antal sider12
ISSN1600-9657
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2022

Bibliografisk note

© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 74845657